Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process

Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> Sat, 11 July 2020 00:28 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466DE3A0A65 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.87
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.87 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NpmuSCclniHL; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [IPv6:2001:638:a000:4134::ffff:40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD6A3A0994; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:28:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.34.52]) by faui40.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CE5548011; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:28:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 10463) id 8081C440043; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:28:00 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:28:00 +0200
From: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Michael StJohns <mstjohns@comcast.net>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, NomCom Chair 2020 <nomcom-chair-2020@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
Message-ID: <20200711002800.GC49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <159422819660.27889.6475902734358747001@ietfa.amsl.com> <b4f5a3cf-5fab-8188-926a-a4100f776610@comcast.net> <1112046E-04ED-4DB1-8766-4928AC5D15F5@akamai.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1112046E-04ED-4DB1-8766-4928AC5D15F5@akamai.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Vi1iLLfnbQX9B1JzL3tGhBzdODo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:28:14 -0000

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 04:31:14PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> 
> 
>   *   I hate to do this, but I'm going to be challenging this particular outcome as it isn't strictly following the rules - basically, Luigi may not be replaced by Tal.  He either serves, or if he declines to serve, the next person on the list - not Tal - will be selected.
> 
> I agree with this challenge, for the reasons Mike posted.

I think Mike did a good job in confusing the facts, and maybe the
explanations from NomCom chair also do not correctly describe what
IMHO happened:

Luigi simply declared that he can not serve, and NomCom chair
had to take the 12th hashed candidate. Where and how is the
reason for declaring that one does not want to serve an aspect
in changing the process for selecting the next candidate from the
list ? I can't find anything about this in he rules. What if
Luigi had said he can not serve without explaining his employer
change ?

Now, if Luigi had said he wanted to serve, and now he works
for Huawei, then i guess NomCom chair would have had the
freedom to decide whether to remove Tal or Luigi. But in either
case this would not change that Tony would be the next one on
the list.

Cheers
---
tte@cs.fau.de