IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 11 July 2020 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C49F3A0769 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z0G6USvzwM03 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 516AB3A0657 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=2tcYzd4ZGeKYozIDCug2Vq/kZoIIAsh5lO6yCcy4lx0=; b=AF2uglTW6Yu4uPQ94vH28eaIN SRRtYYvul40Nq+cCM/1RBiCj074dQ1gk7zmuI2K+1SlOwobGVM1MGTbV2Y7YP8DNoULVN3Jg0R7Rs P9Dhk0IgOFc9BI9cCTyEIch2mNSuw38uoEC95EOoiMDazYPRHO5b+0fcVY97o2Vg+tNcXT63x7+bY R54JJMbpJAw6MtseMiFzuZso+dBsuuDjK+tlUdqXwkbP9pcw+QzZR7x8J8Fnohb1ymm7eeRjf9wZj rNEGD3VEr97vtY2cgsfqNQuO9qgWvczvoqREHCZKtpJGgx0mEgO6tnaGsQrQ95WRGZwtAzv3lv/VF NBtkXQTXg==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:63127 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1ju7P8-00208f-Oj; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:46:31 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_36AF6008-E3D5-4C84-A6A6-88BC94B6B3C7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200711032832.GG49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 21:46:26 -0700
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <D0376262-DCC7-498F-81C0-162A212E71DC@strayalpha.com>
References: <159422819660.27889.6475902734358747001@ietfa.amsl.com> <b4f5a3cf-5fab-8188-926a-a4100f776610@comcast.net> <1112046E-04ED-4DB1-8766-4928AC5D15F5@akamai.com> <20200711002800.GC49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <17D66D97-9F29-470C-83CA-53C48F49D323@strayalpha.com> <20200711011915.GE49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <30972D6C-F7EC-4228-A736-2489CE04530B@strayalpha.com> <20200711032832.GG49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/SD0ZNJOaGsr2Dx2sFtCTqFozx4Q>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 04:46:39 -0000


> On Jul 10, 2020, at 8:28 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> Given how Luigi could have simply said "i withdraw from serving", an
> interpretation like the one Michael and you are alluding to would just
> create an incentive in similar future case for volunteers to not be fully
> forthcoming as to their motivation to withdraw so as not to punish
> colleagues in a new employer they just joined.

That incentive has its own response, once detected. 

> Thats quite silly. 

Conflict of interest is not about ONE possible scenario that YOU (or anyone else) find valid. It’s about whether ANY of US consider ANY possible scenario unacceptable.

What you call “silly” some of us call “ethics”.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email