IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process

Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Sat, 11 July 2020 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560B23A0983 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.318
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nvo8N5P3CL0V for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-4.web-hosting.com (server217-4.web-hosting.com [198.54.116.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FAEB3A0982 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To: From:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GeASc8w1ufLjXH0pRX696lk36d222P5WFUO9/oeYqT0=; b=iLJ0LOo4fki+BsqQQXQ07NzTo hGESd2VrWWi0NkEkL2XG275majaNpLkR4V5GqheA0M+zrdUmVLqHYXGvtr9BO/q5ZP4uNo5Ly54ap nZN5vr7llR2q1A6SKY5vbYYvnnxnMjLAcZ6XXMV4kG8FMjbEUpgpUS/S9MxM9/Ipz6CbpI1XsMn0N GssKXZdAxD+1Wj3Y/6aFdXUlQQ+FZcM08hjUIhc+wbeAN7iMsJpz8b7losOtgHs5MTnHHEJMTdn3q EvzLozeOvIx682qvPRK+obID6/D4N1Kp2fAMXIdkar6VgN8RSz8YCcF7ITOQQZGbbnfr41+QZs6u8 9xA8f+wSA==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-225-198.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.225.198]:62112 helo=[192.168.1.14]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1ju3d5-001oZC-Er; Fri, 10 Jul 2020 20:44:39 -0400
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_5B5D114F-DF43-4049-8FD0-3C3259E7067B"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Subject: Re: Challenge: was Re: Updated Nomcom 2020-2021: Result of random selection process
From: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200711002800.GC49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:44:34 -0700
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <17D66D97-9F29-470C-83CA-53C48F49D323@strayalpha.com>
References: <159422819660.27889.6475902734358747001@ietfa.amsl.com> <b4f5a3cf-5fab-8188-926a-a4100f776610@comcast.net> <1112046E-04ED-4DB1-8766-4928AC5D15F5@akamai.com> <20200711002800.GC49328@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZVF_ZVpEdu-ZAEt4-CjlQKV7tm4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 00:44:43 -0000


> On Jul 10, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:
> 
> I think Mike did a good job in confusing the facts, and maybe the
> explanations from NomCom

IMO, Mike is correct.

I think the intent here is simple: there aren’t Huawei slots; when someone from a given company steps out, that doesn’t mean someone from that company steps in.

The right thing is to re-run the process and see what the result is. Otherwise, as is being seen, one person can “game” who is on the committee. That’s exactly what the detailed automated process is intended to prevent.

Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email