IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Sat, 30 May 2015 06:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21A61A92EA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 23:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cd8XmGNl4m1y for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 23:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B8621A92E7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 23:58:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4U6w6wK000152; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from alma.local (p5DCCC91B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.204.201.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3lzD9p2PDDz2cmq; Sat, 30 May 2015 08:58:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 08:58:04 +0200
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Message-ID: <etPan.55695f7c.316ee1a8.2fd3@alma.local>
In-Reply-To: <55695EAC.80002@cisco.com>
References: <20150529205551.22495.73800.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2F99A0C05DFEE698A643FC97@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <55695EAC.80002@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors
X-Mailer: Airmail (303)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="55695f7c_51fea50b_2fd3"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/1JEiOF1wMy9COxsbYUHgXRJ7TGw>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 06:58:43 -0000

One could write this sentence in the introduction or any other place in the document.
This appears not to be about the acknowledgement section (which I would really like to keep clear of red tape), but about lying in documents.  That should, indeed, be frowned upon.

Grüße, Carsten

On 30 May 2015 at 08:54:57, Benoit Claise (bclaise@cisco.com) wrote:

Thanks to <insert names> for their valuable comments and support on 
the initial idea of this document 

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email