Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 30 May 2015 20:06 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CFD1ACCFC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:06:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mNvy8luYr5wJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF7D1ACCF9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabru16 with SMTP id ru16so82552894pab.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y1AfhlcQ/A+qSQRpdoQ8i6Vfg8s03FvIutll+2KrjiQ=; b=oEDddxFlUfpQ0cvXBxItidNDUAZWHL1Rto8Q3ZxEs/3VQeE1nAeDdc/mYrpB1Ov62N JL0+tjQqyxmg7lbiMHXoolBTluayKvfUL7egWvLNvaommEWFDk/KJ5StXBn4HqI3uQmA ckpM/RImfqawoDUhnU2ozO4QrcbTjnoT9/EMyB9jS2abfpX+Bo3fYRlpfk2cYT+4wJNG F3w7mg3Ovbm8w+81UwPbhkVAV3LqXgVnnMTwICvvhO/07rBlBl3qkBilS4b5wsKECUSF FaIPiWoz2zQbvNTsOSJjqJ2HKyeOKlKXTLS+/HOjUQ8qWIxrO1lLYAUEwRFf0d/FbS74 2OWg==
X-Received: by 10.68.250.229 with SMTP id zf5mr26623585pbc.158.1433016369132; Sat, 30 May 2015 13:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:4e9a:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:4e9a:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y11sm9530722pdi.16.2015.05.30.13.06.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 30 May 2015 13:06:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <556A1824.60302@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 08:05:56 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors
References: <20150529205551.22495.73800.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2F99A0C05DFEE698A643FC97@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <938E070C-A69A-4D37-9B33-3CB07E09595C@piuha.net> <5568F568.9060407@bogus.com> <5568FE28.1090600@gmail.com> <55695D53.3000004@cisco.com> <E3C9C304-EFA2-4C47-AC57-354BEDDC1984@umn.edu> <981C94AECB2DFB46F0990A84@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <981C94AECB2DFB46F0990A84@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/xC4O9IOupp60aEOHw1uIn4MS8bs>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 20:06:10 -0000
On 31/05/2015 04:54, John C Klensin wrote: > > > --On Saturday, May 30, 2015 10:14 -0500 David Farmer > <farmer@umn.edu> wrote: > >>> On May 30, 2015, at 01:48, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote: >>> >>> I like this draft, but I suggest that it apply to ALL RFCs >>> (not just the IETF stream). >> ... > >> Sorry but I disagree. Not ALL RFCs, to exemplify why, I think >> the use of a humorous nom de plume or a sarcastic >> acknowledgement would be perfectly legitimate for RFCs >> published on a particular day in the spring. >> >> Authorship, contribution, and acknowledgement are serious and >> important issues, but that is no reason to completely abandon >> or exclude humor and sarcasm in appropriate doses. > > Indeed. In addition, I think the principle that each stream > should have the option of following the IETF's lead but > modifying it for local circumstances or striking out on its own > is an important one to preserve for all sorts of reasons. There > are also bits in the draft that I'd expect the RFC Editor might > adopt as general policy, but, again, the principle that the RFC > Editor and not the IESG, makes those decisions is important. Yes. Maybe the draft could do a better job of separating issues that are general ethical issues from those that are specific to the IETF way of doing things. I'm very open minded on what happens to the draft: possibly it should just be added to the Tao, for example. The RFC Editor is welcome to cherry-pick the text. Brian P.S. Eagle eyes may have noticed that I plain forgot to include an acknowledgement to John Klensin, who sent me some very helpful comments on the -00 draft.
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Toerless Eckert
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Jari Arkko
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors joel jaeggli
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Eliot Lear
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Benoit Claise
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Carsten Bormann
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Benoit Claise
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors David Farmer
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Eliot Lear
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Eliot Lear
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Harald Alvestrand
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Eliot Lear
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John Levine
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Melinda Shore
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Melinda Shore
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John C Klensin
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Randy Bush
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John Levine
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Ted Lemon
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John R Levine
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors S Moonesamy
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Larry Kreeger (kreeger)
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Joe Abley
- RE: IESG Statement on surprised authors Tony Hain
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Ted Lemon
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors John Levine
- RE: IESG Statement on surprised authors Tony Hain
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Warren Kumari
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Ted Lemon
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Warren Kumari
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Stewart Bryant
- Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors Loa Andersson
- Re: proposed surprise hack, was IESG Statement on… John Levine
- Re: proposed surprise hack, was IESG Statement on… Ted Lemon
- Re: proposed surprise hack, was IESG Statement on… Warren Kumari
- Re: proposed surprise hack, was IESG Statement on… John R Levine