Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 29 May 2015 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746761A8941 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:03:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h7TrdA24tWiE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E1A1A877A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 16:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AD22CEEC; Sat, 30 May 2015 02:03:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VSWqoD-q2plK; Sat, 30 May 2015 02:03:16 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048D92CEE8; Sat, 30 May 2015 02:03:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E55FC3E8-B8FC-4563-B847-839AA48524C7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <2F99A0C05DFEE698A643FC97@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 02:03:13 +0300
Message-Id: <938E070C-A69A-4D37-9B33-3CB07E09595C@piuha.net>
References: <20150529205551.22495.73800.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2F99A0C05DFEE698A643FC97@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/4xPbdMcW1z-4ODZD6KOpQgv_zxI>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 23:03:20 -0000

John,

> I hope this does not turn into a long discussion, but I believe
> the parenthetical note about "surprised acknowledgment" either
> needs to be removed 

FWIW, after seeing your note I do agree that it could be misinterpreted.
I’m fine with removing it. But I make no claims about the preferences
of my fellow IESG members regarding such removal :-)

Jari