IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sun, 31 May 2015 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8351A8A5E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73u7t-uJC-Q7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCD591A8981 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 31 May 2015 12:49:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1Yz9Ea-0001aj-8d; Sun, 31 May 2015 19:49:24 +0000
Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 12:49:23 -0700
Message-ID: <m2d21g1q9o.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IESG Statement on surprised authors
In-Reply-To: <CAKKJt-dRvYUwx0sp9Pwg6zWtULJNSNnEOfgj15j93SwLHESNuw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20150531170415.24384.qmail@ary.lan> <556B4233.8020806@gmail.com> <F7BD3E4838B3CC6A47EF5423@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <CAKKJt-dRvYUwx0sp9Pwg6zWtULJNSNnEOfgj15j93SwLHESNuw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/zO8aiobtGiXvALHZuzJ8Jx1DB9c>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF Disgust <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 19:49:28 -0000

> The more I hear about the cases I know about, the more most sound like
> misunderstandings.

does this imply that we need a 25 page bcp which defines 'misunderstanding'
in exacting detail?

http://www.cafepress.com/mf/65741561/ietf-process_tshirt?shop=RandyBush&productId=999689784

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email