Re: Copying conditions

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr> Thu, 07 October 2004 09:50 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA28304; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:50:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFV4d-0007bo-2G; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 06:00:36 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CFUp9-0005Ez-6e; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 05:44:35 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CFUdp-0003Tm-0V for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 05:32:57 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA27297 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 05:32:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr ([192.44.77.17]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CFUnT-0006NE-Vy for ietf@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2004 05:42:53 -0400
Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [193.52.74.194]) by laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/2003.04.01) with ESMTP id i979VjA25463; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:31:45 +0200
Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (localhost.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) by givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i979VhSj028954; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 11:31:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr)
Message-Id: <200410070931.i979VhSj028954@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
To: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 06 Oct 2004 23:52:15 +0200. <ilupt3v7bw0.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 11:31:43 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) at enst-bretagne.fr
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, scott bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Copying conditions
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   > i.e. the rights under 3667 are the same as under 2026 its just stated
   > more clearly
   
   Even if that is true, it would not change that the current copying
   conditions are a problem for the free software community, and in my
   opinion, consequently the IETF.
   
=> I can't understand why the copyright about a text is a problem
for software when the documentation is explicitely "without
restriction of any kind". Perhaps we don't share the meaning
of "derivative works" (for me, this can't be code itself)?

Regards

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf