Re: Shuffle those deck chairs!

On 15-okt-04, at 15:46, Margaret Wasserman wrote:

> MMI's primary intention is to protect the research investment that has 
> allowed them to build faster and more accurate cheese graters than the 
> competition.

[...]

> Are there any IPR terms that MMI could offer that would meet these 
> goals while also allowing the WRAPCTL protocol to be implemented in 
> OSS implementations?  If we could find that middle ground, I think it 
> would be very valuable to the IETF and to the OSS community.

Maybe I'm being naive here, but wouldn't it be possible for NMI to give 
away a free license to use their patent in the WRAPCTL protocol only? 
In copyright this is done all the time (although seldom for free): when 
I buy a DVD, I get to watch its contents at home, but the license 
doesn't allow me to show the movie in a theater or broadcast it over 
the air.

In cases where the patent has a broader use than as part of a network 
protocol this is actually good for the patent holder as now many 
companies will be implementing it, which can easily lead to reuse of 
said implementation for another purpose in which case a paid license 
would be required.

This doesn't solve all open source issues, but it should make the 
problem more manageable as the code that implements this protocol in 
question can be reused by anyone, just as long as it's only used for 
this specific protocol.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf