Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Fri, 26 April 2019 19:58 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0B11204E8; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=Y8Qw8Nx7; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=vvNajMbc
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1eEdmaOWvBf1; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 087FD1205D8; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241A2220BD; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:58:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:58:06 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=fm2; bh=H6ZrjYdp4NBjFRRDoKrUDzJ +Yi/pJ+sCkalyispH/h0=; b=Y8Qw8Nx7ygQvISryHGL3Z9ShxZrSVXkq6o6ebfS gJhPo1MYwvLnbrVD5r5KHHVtyVgFF6r5kwNpIqfuecC2nwnPMylzD6yj8KnRBASW VLnfvOYPz2xDsA+E2mGJ+2lhb72AWD8de2f9BfBWW+cEYBBvcs3Ah6zZNUbG6D5w 9YmYD2h5W4SQDrpx7crYAss/ZAcPJrp468E9Kq1IGGcj8/Gu7xZ4bBeldtnUzGWc uQrrTubMWaWWh2muP+0QMSMWnL3LmEtmExAoVUDqo8AZ1MN6dmWB2Pf2437TIDuW bHm6QwHAZh4kXsdF6sbXXQNSWrnqGgUm5JDriEnQreHR1uA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=H6ZrjY dp4NBjFRRDoKrUDzJ+Yi/pJ+sCkalyispH/h0=; b=vvNajMbcfiSweM0l13Mdqk tBJ6YkzexfGuX473OXB4PtfeLEWHmLM2vNEw4LPCp467wd5x2R24ajpFj9wNcbm9 7dEwM5wbzhJpLoo2NoWzoaPEAC4kbH/GAAmjAwk/l7w7hwKvgjZ/KAkl3uPIESRb AUKza7Px8R41jXqiE0VPYiS7no1NMXgSz9egPCsblfkeVKwlWoIO43FDU2tTfNEw x6PyfuLLwLN7UukSE/WvKVH5rRWQXjRO2ZeNHcfLMJ4PSkWY+hS8gHCtYyzoGBG4 MYoxhP5qh2usNin2vZOi7XzTRx3RNdYe98ozk2gARPDfPfz7YH4Rxi2+k++64QrQ ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:zWLDXCTwTUyo7yxs3ODjXc1_cbH06VDBjweaaW-TzDMamtT0UeBbdg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrheeigddugeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffktgggufffjgfvfhfosegrtdhmrehhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucfkphepudejfedrfeekrdduudejrdekjeenucfrrghrrghm pehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinhenucevlhhushhtvg hrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:zWLDXCJ_kLraP_1nOg6-DYs4UknYxSv-CXSGkR0jRtwQq0ilV9CLHA> <xmx:zWLDXLYu8IzGLQOarORJRDGLcmLj-lMLjMb4N9Gw_057UKKaVf_ASw> <xmx:zWLDXIAio_3Vq5-KxSl1GkxyOAptKswWy0nHeB089LZK8s6paRYSTQ> <xmx:zmLDXM5A4NVgKxVHUctmKcY8EtnC2WDlZbCvJaq-R5yhLnZpBzxwrw>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro5.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.87]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 56424E4176; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:58:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-Id: <C44EEDFF-C34B-4F7F-8599-115672801DEA@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9B2104CF-610E-42E9-A029-9704EF4C5666"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:58:04 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20190424134823.0c9faf68@elandnews.com>
Cc: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, gen-ads@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190405085139.0d5c39b0@elandnews.com> <54510B49-175B-4CE6-9319-1F9A4803940E@cooperw.in> <033d01d4f52f$c6f2dca0$54d895e0$@olddog.co.uk> <C7274EAB-7DDC-491F-9DD2-0CFFADB13CA9@cooperw.in> <72f00d0b-7ec6-ba6a-b17b-97879d457ae3@comcast.net> <CAKKJt-fOMMdM-mkbJaYpsH6XPCpatUkwZY-d_A+MaNa3nhaNDg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNdaWU4wwOK_MnWC5hOr7Lu3osmC_6_KKxB5fHuHVHyTw@mail.gmail.com> <23d54797-5c94-aa00-ec55-3f2c4fdfcfae@comcast.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424095017.13cdadc8@elandnews.com> <51068F13-E90F-42A2-8AE2-627D5E18B145@akamai.com> <20190424201939.GM3137@localhost> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424134823.0c9faf68@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/2TDJecox71yR_L_RhVhPbzKA12A>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 19:58:22 -0000

Hi SM,

> On Apr 24, 2019, at 5:08 PM, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Nico, Rich,
> At 01:19 PM 24-04-2019, Nico Williams wrote:
>> +1.  AD decisions to not sponsor a draft are really not the sort of
>> decisions that can be appealed.  You've got two ADs per-area, if you
>> can't get either of them, or any of the others, to sponsor your draft,
>> then maybe you're doing things wrong.  A BoF/WG seems like a fine
>> starting point.
> 
> I added a Cc to the Area Director as it is useful to know whether the decision can be appealed or not.

IETF participants are not constrained in what they can appeal, so this is appealable. The process in RFC 2026 Section 6.5.2 applies.

Note the guidance at https://www.ietf.org/blog/guidance-area-director-sponsoring-documents/#choosing <https://www.ietf.org/blog/guidance-area-director-sponsoring-documents/#choosing>.

Alissa

> 
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy