IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Wed, 21 May 2008 18:17 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07F728C200; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7393A68DA for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:17:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jyGzne+K4yvs for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:17:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EB43A685A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,522,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="8904734"
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2008 14:17:10 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4LIHA2X004107 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2008 14:17:10 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4LIH61l026954 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:17:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 May 2008 14:16:40 -0400
Received: from 10.86.115.77 ([10.86.115.77]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:16:40 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:16:46 -0400
Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C459DF4E.388EC%mshore@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Thread-Index: Aci7btQkEonUeydiEd2vvgAKleNSdA==
In-Reply-To: <689924767-1211393168-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1768688618-@bxe033.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Mime-version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2008 18:16:40.0586 (UTC) FILETIME=[D0EA1EA0:01C8BB6E]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=443; t=1211393830; x=1212257830; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshore@cisco.com; z=From:=20Melinda=20Shore=20<mshore@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20ISSN=20for=20RFC=20Series=20under=20Con sideration |Sender:=20 |To:=20IETF=20Discussion=20<ietf@ietf.org>; bh=Bl5Crc0kKIRr5wWpaEoKJZZL1EKUt41aq9o4UFqEmcI=; b=jts3W08HvZFGyPH/66BjPrnAH4+csXUxbDltFqA+i/Jq/JY/5a77Cs0p+L d3uEYA7ulXowlNNSFwtoDM8LWOQczy2BhUUYIYydyEXC5zpKv5xsjPWmhvwS WG3eyODpfQ;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=mshore@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 5/21/08 2:06 PM, "eburger@standardstrack.com"
<eburger@standardstrack.com> wrote:
> Great idea, and I don't see a downside.

The only possible disadvantage I can see is if they're then
cataloged as a serial rather than having individual call numbers
and individual catalog entries, but since the Library of Congress
doesn't seem to be cataloging them today I guess to have them
cataloged at all would be an improvement.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email