Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 21 May 2008 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB9C28C225; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFE228C219; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:14:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bJ4RoyGPEI6G; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615A428C1EE; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [165.227.249.200] (dsl-63-249-108-169.cruzio.com [63.249.108.169]) (authenticated bits=0) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4LJEbBs090150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 May 2008 12:14:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240813c45a240358e7@[165.227.249.200]>
In-Reply-To: <48346149.8040603@isoc.org>
References: <48346149.8040603@isoc.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 12:14:35 -0700
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Mostly sounds fine, with one small glitch.

At 1:52 PM -0400 5/21/08, Ray Pelletier wrote:
>According to the Library of Congress, www.loc.gov/issn/, for serials
>available only in online versions, the ISSN should appear on the title
>screen or home page and/or in the masthead or other areas where
>information about publisher, frequency, subscribing, copyright, etc. is
>given.

The value of adding "ISSN: 12345678" to each RFC seems small, 
particularly relative to the cost of everyone having to update their 
tools and so on. Also, we would have to tell people *not* to put the 
ISSN designation in their Internet Drafts (which are not part of the 
RFC series), but then switch it on for the RFC, and so on.

The cost of putting "ISSN: 12345678" on a few pages at rfc-editor.org 
and ietf.org is tiny and hopefully sufficient for the statement above.

--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf