IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com> Wed, 21 May 2008 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB143A6966; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2867D3A6810; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GBGGLjgT3lnY; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com (rtp-iport-2.cisco.com [64.102.122.149]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038C53A6966; Wed, 21 May 2008 12:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,522,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="8917680"
Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 May 2008 15:45:49 -0400
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m4LJjm6W028868; Wed, 21 May 2008 15:45:49 -0400
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m4LJjkHE017570; Wed, 21 May 2008 19:45:48 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 21 May 2008 15:45:19 -0400
Received: from 10.86.115.77 ([10.86.115.77]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 21 May 2008 19:45:01 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:45:08 -0400
Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
From: Melinda Shore <mshore@cisco.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <C459F404.38920%mshore@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Thread-Index: Aci7eyxhas+BwCduEd2vvgAKleNSdA==
In-Reply-To: <483479D1.8090407@dcrocker.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2008 19:45:19.0315 (UTC) FILETIME=[331FC230:01C8BB7B]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=583; t=1211399149; x=1212263149; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim2001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=mshore@cisco.com; z=From:=20Melinda=20Shore=20<mshore@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20ISSN=20for=20RFC=20Series=20under=20Con sideration |Sender:=20 |To:=20Dave=20Crocker=20<dcrocker@bbiw.net>,=20IETF=20Discu ssion=20<ietf@ietf.org>; bh=q/G9saYa5px+xElTPIre/8wySCRA9pdlVi1AaBVBsWo=; b=E7ekmQVONVdNoPJ7nkuvvzGAgaf7ydE7kyWbUMu/zxmd11N7gxrgDoeUEK wnq5ZPt0bblIQOKkdz6UioWtoTudrasnyKaWQkFIzAT/bmwhgM+nV2YJkuem 4QDKUT201A;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=mshore@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/rtpdkim2001 verified; );
Cc: IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 5/21/08 3:36 PM, "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> The benefit of the new number requires that folk know about it,

I actually don't think that's the case.  I mean, I think
it should be on the documents (otherwise there's some small
point to having one, but not a lot) but I think it's real
value is to the people who organize information.  The
value to users of information is probably indirect at best -
I'm having a hard time imagining a circumstance in which
having the ISSN on the document is of immediate value to
someone using the document.

Melinda

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email