Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

"Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com> Wed, 21 May 2008 18:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915483A6B4F; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0E03A6A8D for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.74
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.74 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vevje+xPsSg7 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E969C3A67F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 May 2008 11:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=mindspring.com; b=AgE6/cAiF2xK+Xn0tqZ0ZnhSML03kKR65y9YLRM6y8H2/RoT5H407psxU6B6Q/1O; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [64.105.34.117] (helo=oemcomputer) by elasmtp-banded.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>) id 1JysuF-0004FF-SH for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 14:19:20 -0400
Message-ID: <002801c8bb6f$331160c0$6801a8c0@oemcomputer>
From: "Randy Presuhn" <randy_presuhn@mindspring.com>
To: "IETF Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <C459DF4E.388EC%mshore@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 11:19:24 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-ELNK-Trace: 4488c18417c9426da92b9037bc8bcf44d4c20f6b8d69d888a63b7957ab9b23b3e9c5f6be826a1e9b94e41bdb73aa1947350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 64.105.34.117
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi -

> From: "Melinda Shore" <mshore@cisco.com>
> To: "IETF Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 11:16 AM
> Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
...
> The only possible disadvantage I can see is if they're then
> cataloged as a serial rather than having individual call numbers
> and individual catalog entries, but since the Library of Congress
> doesn't seem to be cataloging them today I guess to have them
> cataloged at all would be an improvement.
...

What would it take to get them cataloged individually?

Randy

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf