IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu> Thu, 22 May 2008 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960AC28C157; Thu, 22 May 2008 05:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2FA3A6BCB; Thu, 22 May 2008 05:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QbX3r1+9QXMq; Thu, 22 May 2008 05:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from serrano.cc.columbia.edu (serrano.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5223A6B0A; Thu, 22 May 2008 05:23:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.57] (pool-71-250-49-20.nwrknj.east.verizon.net [71.250.49.20]) (user=hgs10 mech=PLAIN bits=0) by serrano.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m4MCN2KK000725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 22 May 2008 08:23:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <1580C072-8D28-40E7-BB8E-0451A7DC9FB4@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Henning Schulzrinne <hgs@cs.columbia.edu>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <8E459C21E56B9357A02509D6@[172.22.20.167]>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 08:23:02 -0400
References: <48349682.6040803@gmail.com> <C45A11F7.38960%mshore@cisco.com> <20080521230951.EB8C85081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <4834C728.1060804@gmail.com> <926E053DEA184164287A0F67@7AD4D3FB4841A5E367CCF211> <20080522093831.GA12731@boreas.isi.edu> <8E459C21E56B9357A02509D6@[172.22.20.167]>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
X-No-Spam-Score: Local
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 128.59.29.6
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, IAB <iab@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On a side note: If we want something URN-like that actually has  
traction outside the IETF, DOIs seem like the right approach. See http://www.doi.org/ 
  Articles in our closest technical disciplines, namely those  
published by ACM and IEEE, already have DOIs, both for journal and  
conference articles.

This is obviously completely orthogonal to the ISSN issue.

Henning
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email