Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration

Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com> Fri, 23 May 2008 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455793A6CCC; Fri, 23 May 2008 08:14:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD5B3A6942; Fri, 23 May 2008 08:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.497, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aF7HD-80iEyx; Fri, 23 May 2008 08:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multicasttech.com (lennon.multicasttech.com [63.105.122.7]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195703A6CBB; Fri, 23 May 2008 08:14:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [63.105.122.7] (account marshall_eubanks HELO [IPv6:::1]) by multicasttech.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 11486172; Fri, 23 May 2008 11:14:53 -0400
Message-Id: <98939B98-4B27-48A6-85F0-1927FFD747A9@multicasttech.com>
From: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C316615572FF8F5@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2)
Subject: Re: [IAOC] ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 11:14:53 -0400
References: <48349682.6040803@gmail.com> <C45A11F7.38960%mshore@cisco.com> <20080521230951.EB8C85081A@romeo.rtfm.com> <4834C728.1060804@gmail.com> <926E053DEA184164287A0F67@7AD4D3FB4841A5E367CCF211> <20080522093831.GA12731@boreas.isi.edu> <8E459C21E56B9357A02509D6@[172.22.20.167]> <1580C072-8D28-40E7-BB8E-0451A7DC9FB4@cs.columbia.edu> <A7A9257C-740B-4288-8643-F3F00A85A1B4@multicasttech.com> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C316615572FF8F5@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2)
Cc: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>, IAB <iab@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On May 23, 2008, at 10:58 AM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

> I would rather pay $1 to provide bigger, better cookies or tap- 
> dancing penguins during the plenaries.rsha

I don't think $1 USD would pay for one of those bigger, better,  
cookies, so I guess tap-dancing penguins it is.

Regards
Marshall

>
> I see no value in doing this and in fact plenty of reasons to oppose  
> it.
>
> Where is the $1500 of value to the IETF here? I can see the value to  
> DOI. If the IETF were to go this route it should be expecting DOI to  
> be paying a cut of the additional business generated, not to hand  
> money over.
>
> From: wgchairs-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of Marshall Eubanks
> Sent: Thu 22/05/2008 9:10 AM
> To: Henning Schulzrinne
> Cc: Working Group Chairs; IAB; IETF Discussion; IAOC; Bill Manning;  
> John C Klensin; RFC Editor
> Subject: Re: ISSN for RFC Series under Consideration
>
>
> On May 22, 2008, at 8:23 AM, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
>
> > On a side note: If we want something URN-like that actually has
> > traction outside the IETF, DOIs seem like the right approach. See http://www.doi.org/
> >  Articles in our closest technical disciplines, namely those
> > published by ACM and IEEE, already have DOIs, both for journal and
> > conference articles.
> >
>
> Note that
>
>     DOI is a registered URI within the info-URI namespace (IETF RFC
> 4452, the "info" URI Scheme for Information
>     Assets with Identifiers in Public Namespaces). Further information
> is available at http://info-uri.info.
>
> These are not free; if we got DOI's for all RFCs through, e.g.,
> Bowker, it would cost
>
>     Up to 9999 DOIs - $1500 per year
>
> I think it would be a good idea. A $ 1 increase in registration fees
> would more than pay for it.
>
> Regards
> Marshall
>
>
> > This is obviously completely orthogonal to the ISSN issue.
> >
> > Henning
> > _______________________________________________
> > IETF mailing list
> > IETF@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IAOC mailing list
> IAOC@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iaoc

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf