IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 07 June 2019 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0719A1201F8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSv8vvDa8Fdx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEE461201DD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023893818D; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 14:31:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id C2CF5F2A; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 14:32:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBD2AA; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 14:32:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1906071237490.13812@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <5B42C40D-50EF-4D56-8661-BFA8FF107426@consulintel.es> <33839E7AE337BD20319D6BF0@PSB> <8989A94D-FDA7-40E3-BE4B-023DA221BD7C@consulintel.es> <5f314b9b-d922-8d47-a913-a7e58aef98ec@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1906071237490.13812@bofh.nohats.ca>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 14:32:33 -0400
Message-ID: <13981.1559932353@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8aEGz0Gfbj65-D-2Ocuf7nQdnhM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:32:50 -0000

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> wrote:
    >> IETF 102 was scheduled to be in SF but moved to Montreal.  I
    >> think it's too soon to know what the situation is going to be
    >> in 2021.

    > And if I understood correctly, this planned San Francisco meeting is
    > happening because of money locked/lost if we don't use it. So we
    > might just have to do the meeting in the US. And I guess, we will
    > find out how bad things really are?

No, that's not exactly the case.
We booked two in SF (102, 111), and moved the first (102).
The IETF111 meeting can not use that credit because we already booked.
Maybe the LLC can negotiate something, I don't know.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email