IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US

"Scott Weeks" <surfer@mauigateway.com> Sat, 08 June 2019 23:19 UTC

Return-Path: <surfer@mauigateway.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3353A120058 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 16:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.934
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.934 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ok2FKEDlFkEv for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 16:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imta-38.everyone.net (imta-36.everyone.net [216.200.145.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9413F120020 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 16:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (omta002.sj2.proofpoint.com [127.0.0.1]) by imta-38.everyone.net (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x58NGuVS031143 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 16:19:50 -0700
X-Eon-Originating-Account: YIyN1onyZZOaBu8u66_JHRV-3CryFHPJ3MdMh6zcjULJ9707EaSJXfkU6CWrQ-t7
X-Eon-Dm: m0116954.ppops.net
Received: by m0117568.mta.everyone.net (EON-PICKUP) id m0117568.5cf9935c.9cd2; Sat, 8 Jun 2019 16:19:49 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190608161949.2EE70CD7@m0117568.ppops.net>
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 16:19:49 -0700
From: Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com>
Reply-To: surfer@mauigateway.com
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
X-Eon-Sig: AQLAznNc/EKVscyUrgEAAAAB,0837e74c26da6ad0aad984d6fb6f8b09
X-Eip: WDFsc7gSL9dDp_JtzhYxBn2ildgCc34hdVequjUia38
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-06-08_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=441 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1906080177
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9ptEIba0dzdkblcrIuEV1ENE4Cc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 23:19:55 -0000


--- nico@cryptonector.com wrote:
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>

> So, how does one prove one does not have a social media account?

You don't.  You assert you don't have one and good luck.  If they
reject, go create one and seed it with harmless content.
----------------------------------------------


The reason some don't have one is the act of creating one creates
undesirable tracking abilities by untrustworthy organizations,
regardless of content.

scott

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email