IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 07 June 2019 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDBF120018 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xnRrtWECZVJK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E61E3120104 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 12:13:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899F83818D; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 15:11:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 28B04F2A; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 15:13:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263B1AA; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 15:13:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
cc: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet=40consulintel.es@dmarc.ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
In-Reply-To: <F3AA581C-5DE9-45E3-87DE-5843D2EE8B62@cable.comcast.com>
References: <5B42C40D-50EF-4D56-8661-BFA8FF107426@consulintel.es> <F3AA581C-5DE9-45E3-87DE-5843D2EE8B62@cable.comcast.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 15:13:02 -0400
Message-ID: <25599.1559934782@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/GXiIpMjU-vUhIiFTRT9AzBIKRn8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 19:13:12 -0000

Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote:
    > I do not defend this policy, but do wish to note that it is probably
    > also the case for users of social media platforms (like me) that
    > commercial entities know far more about you than the government.

I think the biggest risk is for non-users of social media platforms.
It's hard to prove you really don't have an account, and it sounds obstructionist.


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email