IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Fri, 07 June 2019 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=10610a8d52=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510091200B3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:38:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3MJo6nxWyV_w for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5B24120026 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=consulintel.es; s=MDaemon; t=1559925501; x=1560530301; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=User-Agent:Date: Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Thread-Topic:References:In-Reply-To: Mime-version:Content-type:Content-transfer-encoding; bh=TifuhNAF CdyBMkXL8Ta+clupAgTY5F5o5oVWe238O90=; b=XckfNJQIj3cOIcCCBQGGOtUW 7KIgF1TiiZOFF2ORV3efXeWvABEAT5fPhmrUi7PDGBOjzPubU3DySMrUMjsNT3PN NcNSBLeureIw9FZ4EyIU2mlbs/fsaH2HnJa/3HJgvL1Fay9k6D73XW4akF091x/E 2MEcd7Cpp+zM7UWvzBA=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:38:21 +0200
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:38:21 +0200
Received: from [10.10.10.130] by mail.consulintel.es (MDaemon PRO v16.5.2) with ESMTPA id md50006288252.msg for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:38:20 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:f89b:19c:e4d0:8c42
X-MDHelo: [10.10.10.130]
X-MDArrival-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:38:20 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=10610a8d52=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ietf@ietf.org
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.a.190512
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:38:11 +0200
Subject: Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <F52865F0-86D7-4C5E-951D-018CC58E4B82@consulintel.es>
Thread-Topic: privacy and IETF meetings in US
References: <5B42C40D-50EF-4D56-8661-BFA8FF107426@consulintel.es> <33839E7AE337BD20319D6BF0@PSB> <8989A94D-FDA7-40E3-BE4B-023DA221BD7C@consulintel.es> <5f314b9b-d922-8d47-a913-a7e58aef98ec@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5f314b9b-d922-8d47-a913-a7e58aef98ec@gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/XE58ruqT1mbW2ZK9RF5tdSqgGSA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:38:26 -0000

Some of us, who pay from our own pocket, buy the IETF flights 11-12 months in advance (and they are non-refundable), in order to be able to get as lower fares as possible. Otherwise, we can't attend the meetings.

If the decision is taken only 1 year in advance, is fine to avoid the cancelation of the ticket, but is if the new venue is not announced at the same time, is too late to get a low fare.

This needs to be considered by the LLC.

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

El 7/6/19 18:31, "ietf en nombre de Melinda Shore" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org en nombre de melinda.shore@gmail.com> escribió:

    On 6/7/19 8:24 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > What I'm suggesting is that regardless of our decision on the
    > meetings in US, we as IETF consider this as something acceptable?
    
    IETF 102 was scheduled to be in SF but moved to Montreal.  I
    think it's too soon to know what the situation is going to be
    in 2021.
    
    Melinda
    
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email