Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Fri, 07 June 2019 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8A8120046 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:30:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QIsDewjH7cri for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52e.google.com (mail-pg1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1689512002E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 09:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id 20so1437918pgr.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:30:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=juEyhwBcbWxV85v0V/efYiZTV5lXt8osJTE4dNwqIyg=; b=je5GdJf0GmcKiEmLnY6srVVm4F9fF6jDixEGEiYVGzZ2S6BhadPsiQIiSA/oJssdKi o0NRjSsW2ew/9wlr93sid51qIgkKAZyQeBUmPxl2OTjhaNjVHWX0E73nvut0Af91dqBz C1JFaMAt1McE5ZwFrPY/Z62MTs83yyaQFxBW/bWpMgQRSKb2b1bNzWmbU5/v6NT36Ndd zxK66AWF/e1xbsORBY5LXAzSQbtCFNKKDbevgqCoI+G9kU0lIpQed728P5I5hBSEkusL DYm2+GZQvh1uQlCiThf/HVWMiO8OS5r66RaYZJri6M421qalElqupwqK/td/r7PMFhrG vBJQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=juEyhwBcbWxV85v0V/efYiZTV5lXt8osJTE4dNwqIyg=; b=saMxNiQyWT1wU3XC4hbMW0jgWWhqnQWwxuIETLe3GYDmi0nuXpVg1tUcEO6CDpXEzV 4xOn/PtTW5fhJ3YVB1cW6KEFN9ilU3PWk+nrbYl4N9kxsVOjS2Y1o3iwlnT/5zcXwdON V9PLdvim6NQ3Ph3JfHSXvWPe2rcMn2CD0Vt2E4Qhp/Dm5BQ1BhN52F5nyiUxbCNJ4sjn 9ThhXw2KdRukYLDSAA2xImSOBbxi8oQ8CwA1GOax99He2swwxwrqFHVz4CnIgy5LxpIe IFgaMB2g8agk1H1puoVAA32freEuf4AbuHg4qu6VOLrvlolbMnRz2ZPucq/kHkXre6I6 dS0A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX8JwdsEmdF7VlRt3SrkrnGrCoD3W7z4/4ePdCy7UO8NkkUa+O3 Gf38NPmFgF5aGBYRlxdkHtQxnHzt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxqVW66dhFb4fuDs2SUn+Cu+xMsoLn9XIjDiyHG7p9CuCf+ppQYGlZe3lk/9MCoo3AL94t3Vg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a789:: with SMTP id f9mr6389955pjq.20.1559925020001; Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:30:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Melindas-MacBook-Pro.local (63-140-67-234.dynamic.lte.acsalaska.net. [63.140.67.234]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o11sm2209588pjp.31.2019.06.07.09.30.18 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 07 Jun 2019 09:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: privacy and IETF meetings in US
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <5B42C40D-50EF-4D56-8661-BFA8FF107426@consulintel.es> <33839E7AE337BD20319D6BF0@PSB> <8989A94D-FDA7-40E3-BE4B-023DA221BD7C@consulintel.es>
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5f314b9b-d922-8d47-a913-a7e58aef98ec@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 08:30:18 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8989A94D-FDA7-40E3-BE4B-023DA221BD7C@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/Wcp4xkJypowiOM4GD-KVXVwvT00>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 16:30:22 -0000

On 6/7/19 8:24 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> What I'm suggesting is that regardless of our decision on the
> meetings in US, we as IETF consider this as something acceptable?

IETF 102 was scheduled to be in SF but moved to Montreal.  I
think it's too soon to know what the situation is going to be
in 2021.

Melinda