IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting deadlines for the IESG and the community

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 17 March 2024 04:39 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA56C14F749 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kij8GvTaGPli for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfout7-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout7-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.150]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6686C14F706 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 21:39:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB571C00094; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:39:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:39:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1710650370; x=1710736770; bh=nulF8gGDdZklB+IuwuuO5lR5CUYx 7YapQ8TBQRJ1oOU=; b=PVz6O/nywTQS/XoIQ2a4Biqp8Jq+hEAWxBsTfeVmOST4 PMc0lb6bx2mousIfYPcFHhgTlkkW/vp9e8ESOY/qmPE1SGJp9bp23Nfc3sjLMBoJ w7PTbz8sWGmnaP07mZz5QGxnQZiR9mzrRu0piPtNWRO6FIltQGnukIlhFY7TaPFc apIbThY7J+j4S1iAV9FFmgJeFLVBYHUcmqRkeDmn1xN3fYmYeTyj2e4ipRqRmjAl hOx4N7tgBqM3Duw7VAj9FcqB7w/xOjB73j1tsRQVbIDFAFalhbxPRX6ttciNACFC AK58/ye7FqcANqaPcByJSKFzrNOWJmY/yJG5pK/Z7A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:AnT2ZX2lqpzHSUfhtKHCamG3bzNWm0nj2lfZNQ_-KQbHtDCbWnibyg> <xme:AnT2ZWHgiEKWdXJ7DPQhJubZjkgC6VTnlGg_csYhka_cRfMDW0ExKXKy6QqCpRnUy CnF9lLiIfHv1Q>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:AnT2ZX4HqzyHxOn3BavuVgc057smk-T6Wt4p0rp-OUv7prawUgXiS_eG2mkoxJrTX0-OR-Ildvfce8HPOpvBHfqQW8vQ8XSk>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrkeefgdejgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtkfffgggfuffvvehfhfgjsegrtderredtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhh ucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeejvdfhtdduhedugfekteeikeetfeefhefgueetgfdvhfeh vefghfeijedvtdevueenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:AnT2Zc3QmO6Zpw6ivjDUyeV14bAFet36RImV6vkjpZqwiO2QkMYiWA> <xmx:AnT2ZaHZ6GEHaOT7v6MkRTl7k-VEINYbQPyfBY7zuOKUBfYO0_bTYw> <xmx:AnT2Zd_r_aIqjVjh3CBNorgKbeKK8PBSyLu2Bv6NZeUuh3k6vpGFfA> <xmx:AnT2ZXlZOc6eF9XHePnRcodWlGfkd7WUxBDenB569zIssKCeHuQ5_g> <xmx:AnT2ZWg-ZZ4E1kYwEOu3MhLO-lmRzfvcEj4ep8eqg6I3LtwYeR3n7R1kNsg>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:39:30 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------hv0F1d089GzOy95w5pfDXWTL"
Message-ID: <6daeee22-2b5a-4448-b5ca-52c4f8bcb305@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:39:30 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting deadlines for the IESG and the community
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <7826C4F13FA874CD79459A4B@PSB> <65A7921B-2A05-439A-976C-226560C5E7F4@strayalpha.com> <e0702d8a-cea5-4928-b571-98442ccd4f29@petit-huguenin.org> <6d0c6b07-2fc3-496c-ba66-dc40cbf46df8@dfn.de> <69EE71C9-C42B-49A6-BC0D-508F799DB68E@tzi.org> <1d301b86-c994-4a9c-810c-9a42e12a0ad8@network-heretics.com> <53C617FA98D84931861C1F59@PSB> <CAL0qLwbwC4fvu4b3=oyFmOduxHPmTYJRTXBAXFDk9xi+7=FLdA@mail.gmail.com> <05d98ba9-e023-4664-a18a-48ceba2aaed4@network-heretics.com> <2A220CCB-F938-49E2-9D7D-4BA368EB5098@tzi.org> <d63997b9-70ef-43be-a660-e861419357b2@network-heretics.com> <CAL0qLwYcw4h2ue=RO4i6ZFoPgQC_1eX5WCbvLDZNFKUeubCgug@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYcw4h2ue=RO4i6ZFoPgQC_1eX5WCbvLDZNFKUeubCgug@mail.gmail.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/BmJhEvSvhoDHPntpAjNnkceaCr8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 04:39:37 -0000

On 3/17/24 00:37, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:

>     To reiterate, I absolutely do not think that this is something
>     that should vary from one WG to another.  IETF is already too
>     hostile to generalists, and it needs their input badly.
>
>
> And you believe rigidity in structure relieves such hostility, or 
> contributes to it?

I believe it's easier for a participant to contribute to a diversity of 
working group discussions when the rules are essentially the same from 
one WG to another.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email