Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting deadlines for the IESG and the community
Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Sun, 24 March 2024 10:06 UTC
Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0410FC14F70E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.604
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.604 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fWgcEn_ak-lI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.145]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5C2C14F70C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 03:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15C91C00091; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 06:05:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 24 Mar 2024 06:05:56 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1711274756; x= 1711361156; bh=/vZHPULJYQLO688+H2UAXE/V6cK8/G/mwfz1Ip/IzH4=; b=G gmGiixMiegI8oSd3Jd+6j+3QNBsVsKSsQDZ/3ns/o9/tRIsSLoXT4dQOdef89Yqk EsPoAlBQE2tKIb0mEpIt4HXcP1BaK4qqguleOY58h39cMw8zgxQatjcEdlZKHO9D B0ClfRRA5oZ0mUHoFXRgrIaGqcS4Miq28XcEMO3L0H0hQS5aIALpi2dhZSnKPupH ww1dZuL3FVbW5gPa5Oslk214dFmGAM9OJmOt16oS3wcDXQF7re7SBTXJSofNdWT6 F6cMd0YZIoV1zaDt1xuzWw5diAqqNCrfkvN9oyJuE/WPsf3W8p45OUwIWv70L1O7 Z1fiJ3SMvQ+tbd/GM8fug==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:A_v_Za9tLI_4YxvqURNNPofnfYps4Ph4Q5Gw9tBJOTyKGi6hs2Hw6Q> <xme:A_v_ZasJwAdUTO1AUVW4Se6UBKMout-4hhVgdhnBKNkaXkdbVxLf7083gn77kWpIU 2UGvp9hF7GS8Q>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:A_v_ZQAYeACNTnBwqdkzyNgIPIEMD2W2eX_Og50fRw_prSHKkIhP2aJfXqyJ0OsIus4DFSuHc3wyGMuyaIS_LkY0KuGo4TgO>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledruddtjedgudefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfhfhfgjtgfgsehtke ertddtvdejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevffekuefgke duhfekhfdvjeffheegheegjefgvedttdfhfeehudeftddtjedvffenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorh hkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:A_v_ZSeklX0bE4AMNPkiS6qPurZQVauKP5GStvQuIVErU3mC5yZQug> <xmx:A_v_ZfOyaUyvgsJ-nRILT_MBv5W7kqbdYrKj2ql5ZPzgqVd0ZOneag> <xmx:A_v_ZckfsrJWNT8bIF46phuN9T00Er5mdE9QBy1Xz8VzsfXZa5Smyw> <xmx:A_v_ZRuwTyw9KG-lCsfYkylgkh3OMYFCRNjQxUepo5yZV3-jBRmT2A> <xmx:BPv_ZYYLrwatHD8VURsOkltD26lstpQqn1aUZNzqWcwOy93XnGpT5yilDZQ>
Feedback-ID: i5d8c41f0:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 06:05:55 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <897e2bce-2187-433c-af26-c8c8f3b37c1b@network-heretics.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 06:05:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting deadlines for the IESG and the community
Content-Language: en-US
To: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <7826C4F13FA874CD79459A4B@PSB> <65A7921B-2A05-439A-976C-226560C5E7F4@strayalpha.com> <e0702d8a-cea5-4928-b571-98442ccd4f29@petit-huguenin.org> <6d0c6b07-2fc3-496c-ba66-dc40cbf46df8@dfn.de> <69EE71C9-C42B-49A6-BC0D-508F799DB68E@tzi.org> <1d301b86-c994-4a9c-810c-9a42e12a0ad8@network-heretics.com> <53C617FA98D84931861C1F59@PSB> <85D994BF-5E89-437B-821C-12DE93C403B3@episteme.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20240322143647.10ef96f8@elandnews.com> <569FBECE-E637-4B2A-86C5-4F7B7AEC333E@episteme.net> <7F1502637EB78EE7032F4384@PSB> <6.2.5.6.2.20240323004217.115aeb28@elandnews.com> <240d0bf6-36e8-410d-8f86-2069dfc16f52@network-heretics.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20240323154539.127fbdb8@elandnews.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20240323154539.127fbdb8@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/LZEUr2t1lIuafujBgrTt-MsMcr0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 10:06:04 -0000
On 3/23/24 19:49, S Moonesamy wrote: > > If I am not mistaken, you commented about WG homogeneity. Some WGs > work somewhat differently, e.g. some use RFC 8874. The people showing > interest in their deliverables seem okay with that. Let's say that I > have not showed any interest in the deliverables. I could not find a > good reason to impose a change in work practice. I don't think it's possible to reliably establish that the people showing interest in a WG's deliverables (for the present or future) are okay with a particular set of practices. Even if a WG explicitly asks everyone on its mailing list for their consent to a change in the rules, new participants may join at any time, and it's not desirable to exclude or discourage new participants. I'm not a big fan of use of github by WGs, but at least that particular subject has had extensive discussion within IETF. I don't think it should serve as a general example of why it's okay for some WGs to work differently than others. One of my big concerns about working groups, especially these days, is that there seems to be an increasing tendency for WGs to operate as closed clubs. They can't stop new people from joining their mailing lists or their publicly announced meetings, but they can discourage participation from newcomers in various ways. Holding "interim" meetings (whether remote or in-person) without community-wide announcement in the usual means (e.g. ietf-announce) is certainly one way they can do that. Having the chair or other designee object to any suggestion by an "outsider" is another way. It's absolutely NOT okay for a WG to operate in that way, even if some of the core participants think it's ok. Keith
- Question about pre-meeting document posting deadl… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Benoit Claise
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… George Michaelson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Jan-Frederik Rieckers
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Martin J. Dürst
- Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Question a… Abdussalam Baryun
- RE: Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Questi… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Questi… Keith Moore
- Re: Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Questi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Lloyd W
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Benson Muite
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Eliot Lear
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy