Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting deadlines for the IESG and the community
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 15 March 2024 22:49 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D46FC14F6A9; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pf-WnmhJPRut; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78C86C14F6A5; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1dd9568fc51so23599895ad.2; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710542998; x=1711147798; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xMouYKDftkJwxsa9f6nIYKUXxiLRqHL6NdjwmMP0YK8=; b=kvs4C8dSFcWk7om+bG0vfQiBMfXdG++gkqrdcUyQ18YMCYtkNjc68Jh4mXLK1rDxQL t1tTufAYCB66O5pfR8s0zus5QX4m9gq0vZJ1T/wI4vpShYIYH2w1/MCivT4IlacccMlE /oTHaLyn7Xa2p4PpBzA1rLKl8Tk5apsSgVZsJPdP+u4hFnd7HeahRcTMnTpvutiKMHyE U+wLIceKE6kHZ2/CCeVFKtL+6f1cDLYy+J7PfNg5AYN+RY3l5v3SgpFcDu8yZjYVoykm usrPmTNcXutXAbC06w4H/mjF/aUTCuymh+WOPiXJ/zC2a1dTj94H+ZCDvF3ruLc21BD7 nHXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710542998; x=1711147798; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xMouYKDftkJwxsa9f6nIYKUXxiLRqHL6NdjwmMP0YK8=; b=Mbx4guB7JIRALA85NsmBxXJB2VsfJPhPtpkophoMADq3ol1E1Bd6bizZ30ntZjet18 CBdhjuWn7/kNI9yNadz1Tx+ep8oUoPJCWvxFucbvGBcohp9VGoVZTvE/QeveUGYO9WvP JPnI+6rdZ7XMf+c8ysmSm65WGRXsfn0q9edxKcEpK1xfC49QCTo1F7q/6BtQZy8AyPyO JirPfkftwXq47t/bT5DphfV5dix3x+mqR3Tcupih9IDHsnWJIeMJAxnuF4R5YJ3XUO8f P2n+Di6Ps4eNn1On1GKcyWf3v7i8UpuPHiLPj8BPGKlp5wf03epAWbJQHCjugC0cGeYQ odyw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUVxTgnoJRCPaemupGYT/6mlpSXMLmaI5D06KjDsp7O07OszsffdLjmN69ZH5dJN2bIwhxmGZ7cybwu22pUkP4/5b0KQPkC7Xdzf22K
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw4QBEjiLLx5d68dJX6zh3DG0qoIG6IRx807ruHw2cToiWGDUoS tGZdimlqezxRjbU0nBGaV2Amr3vZmYiFcrm1zgQxFDGlZ9UlDZaWO3TNIvaj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGoyBjqJnWkNYuMiOLqxk5pK7ZcMst3qCxlxaosAN+iW5egFfUQWEVxgFYbaRiuTHtesNXEPw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e84d:b0:1dc:fcc4:b3a5 with SMTP id t13-20020a170902e84d00b001dcfcc4b3a5mr6997842plg.35.1710542997591; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707? ([2404:4400:541d:a600:44b7:2c2e:2bc6:8707]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id im9-20020a170902bb0900b001dd69a8828dsm4501024plb.247.2024.03.15.15.49.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <2780ea4c-6041-901c-bb58-ef5e2b1e8a00@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 11:49:52 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0
Subject: Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting deadlines for the IESG and the community
Content-Language: en-US
To: Pete Resnick <resnick@episteme.net>, Marc Petit-Huguenin <marc@petit-huguenin.org>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <7826C4F13FA874CD79459A4B@PSB> <65A7921B-2A05-439A-976C-226560C5E7F4@strayalpha.com> <e0702d8a-cea5-4928-b571-98442ccd4f29@petit-huguenin.org> <63B37D76-6744-4A3E-BE64-B181013B33CE@episteme.net>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <63B37D76-6744-4A3E-BE64-B181013B33CE@episteme.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/3_XUaLoI93nTLGAozdgGT6Xvvwg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 22:49:59 -0000
On 16-Mar-24 10:17, Pete Resnick wrote: > Agreed. We really need to have a bit of a general re-think on what we > really want out of these rules instead of (IMO) silly point-fixes that > don't really address the issue. Re-opening the queue on Sunday is > completely counter-productive if the point was not to have new versions > just before the f2f. (Similarly, the current proposal to remove the I-D > expiry date, which I agree is anachronistic and not serving its original > purpose, is another attempt at a simple point fix that does not address > the original reason those dates existed.) > > Can we have a go at why we want these mechanisms in the first place > instead of making arbitrary changes? As far as I recall, it was originally intended to ensure that in the face-to-face meeting of each WG, people had all read the same version of each I-D. As hacks to bypass the posting deadline have emerged (with github PRs only being the latest hack), this has become less and less effective. Maybe that battle has now been lost. However, we should consider two other effects of the deadline: 1. Negative: A ridiculously large number of drafts are posted within ~72 hours, as Carsten pointed out recently**. So anybody who tries to track the IETF very broadly is swamped three times a year. 2. Positive: People are deadline-driven. If we didn't have the deadline two weeks before the meeting, the ridiculous number of drafts would be posted... today! > Can the IESG organize that > discussion somewhere? For example, at ietf@ietf.org, since it seems highly on-topic here. ** https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tools-discuss/BXXyyODzUZq2sPaucVQcuBHxgBY/ Brian
- Question about pre-meeting document posting deadl… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Benoit Claise
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… George Michaelson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Jan-Frederik Rieckers
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Martin J. Dürst
- Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Question a… Abdussalam Baryun
- RE: Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Questi… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Questi… Keith Moore
- Re: Rule of removing adopted work (was Re: Questi… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Pete Resnick
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Lloyd W
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Benson Muite
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Salz, Rich
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… touch@strayalpha.com
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Eliot Lear
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Rob Wilton (rwilton)
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Michael Richardson
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… John C Klensin
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… Keith Moore
- Re: Question about pre-meeting document posting d… S Moonesamy