IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Wed, 24 April 2019 20:59 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F60120417 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:59:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kJe3LekOJ2aJ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82d.google.com (mail-qt1-x82d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA30D1203F6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82d.google.com with SMTP id p20so22013013qtc.9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:59:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/dVkrhOGfqNOk6fLGxYqLvB4IOBqKn7n4+jb7s2CSgg=; b=p+cniPCUS76IE0oj3SiuqwBOMmdIqwQjDhyuZRAsrUQ2zpm1Mhxy+4/Et9kiCxbFiH L0QoAWylRxF+Wg4hsRA9JQlYCAkm46HwOslspgezbaQ77ARTGFjV4BNvWPcMnmnXOOBq vaQZ7+toWYSFNNllnB1nkueE2migx7LLH2rml8qETwhw/agZVHO94/L3E5iHYIAUsK8W 8TjYNScC4SnZXNoq8+3l0wrOq7R8He3EnklwCaaDBeKsz/dxsqHmUcHeCArXsRM1hQ8f k0MqQxeb00IMDNY/6yGcDgruftPuDNH6zGhHuEFmTsDNwgCrWIWCarrub02EgGGbLz4q Ad6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/dVkrhOGfqNOk6fLGxYqLvB4IOBqKn7n4+jb7s2CSgg=; b=aPBShnyGdzXTdEMQBhBkz8NTowtLZ7EeC1cucy90VoY6lXsivX/ZLCl0tqGjnY3sCY r3L25TfjrJOYr07KVCAXKI2Ea6Ae9eiQdw1lEMYn/zY59ObiYOUn+17WHARMaA7iff7E 3bsZ19a+FPqw24y4rTMvBMDv+BJrGpBFBmNCB6aDT4HXOcux6PUCCor2B+XTfoFaeGVJ sRJUE7PRDU8jjV6/YYOYATsZ3nu79sIZlVkX+KP+jIhsfD4wkekVZUS300L5ehU5XXS6 SoNA+40xKBLG/POL7BuMm1XaXnp4ivFFOBmRahEw0Seb8nGXLj8amI1Srz7CWtYCQ+GF O6lA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUBnI3c3onW5l64GKJRG5Q7H0DSbmjCxWnQBXiuV1ibskT415f0 eC2MCiixGq5oOdCcpUUph6Y4azNWF9+APdqwbqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy35hI9MvGxYidxxGfRBoxaGNkkR2J9eT+i3NxNv3p1UbeEbExL8p+55E/jwjVc0HxLmrx4MeIzQnNEfqAdD6Q=
X-Received: by 2002:aed:2282:: with SMTP id p2mr27223824qtc.334.1556139563788; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:59:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20190405085139.0d5c39b0@elandnews.com> <54510B49-175B-4CE6-9319-1F9A4803940E@cooperw.in> <033d01d4f52f$c6f2dca0$54d895e0$@olddog.co.uk> <C7274EAB-7DDC-491F-9DD2-0CFFADB13CA9@cooperw.in> <72f00d0b-7ec6-ba6a-b17b-97879d457ae3@comcast.net> <CAKKJt-fOMMdM-mkbJaYpsH6XPCpatUkwZY-d_A+MaNa3nhaNDg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNdaWU4wwOK_MnWC5hOr7Lu3osmC_6_KKxB5fHuHVHyTw@mail.gmail.com> <23d54797-5c94-aa00-ec55-3f2c4fdfcfae@comcast.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424095017.13cdadc8@elandnews.com> <51068F13-E90F-42A2-8AE2-627D5E18B145@akamai.com> <20190424201939.GM3137@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <20190424201939.GM3137@localhost>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:59:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0LfA9d1+p+myvwGFDXuQhNdP0iUAny22VCZF6p9Xdr8A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ebaf9105874cf9d9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ByIKQMiBZFBDn2CEO2gHR_uu4fo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:59:27 -0000

Nico,

What is the definition of a "frivolous" petition? Just curious how that
would work...

Cheers,
Andy


On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:20 PM Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 06:58:44PM +0000, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > >    Would the decision of an Area Director/IESG not to sponsor the
> > >    draft be considered as behaviour that adversely affect the
> > >    standardization process?
> >
> > No, because the concern seems to be about deciding the right venue
> > where *more input* can be put into the document.
>
> +1.  AD decisions to not sponsor a draft are really not the sort of
> decisions that can be appealed.  You've got two ADs per-area, if you
> can't get either of them, or any of the others, to sponsor your draft,
> then maybe you're doing things wrong.  A BoF/WG seems like a fine
> starting point.
>
> I'd also like to second EKR's proposal that the IAB and IESG should get
> a first crack at policing themselves.  That wouldn't exclude a proper
> recall mechanism that can be initiated outside the IAB/IESG, but maybe
> we wouldn't need to make that mechanism too easy to start.  Lastly, a
> mechanism for quickly dealing with frivolous petitions can make it
> tolerable to make starting a recall process too easy.
>
> Nico
> --
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email