Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
Geoff Mulligan <geoff.ietf@mulligan.com> Mon, 08 November 2010 03:45 UTC
Return-Path: <geoff.ietf@mulligan.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914D83A6970; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:45:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.650, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JZqUE0XauSzM; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:45:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server2.coslabs.com (server2.coslabs.com [64.111.18.234]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44A23A696D; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:45:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grab (mail.coslabs.com [199.233.92.34]) by server2.coslabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AF21842F; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:45:59 -0700 (MST)
Received: from [192.168.0.100] (unknown [222.128.202.225]) by grab (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3365580688; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:45:31 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff.ietf@mulligan.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
In-Reply-To: <4CD76304.4090508@dcrocker.net>
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com> <4CD76304.4090508@dcrocker.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:45:36 -0700
Message-ID: <1289187936.1619.38.camel@d430>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:45:30 -0000
Maybe for the experiment we should also move the Social to Friday evening: 1) it won't interfere with IP meeting time; 2) less people so better chance of getting a ticket; 3) more folks will stay for Friday meetings; 4) IETF meeting will be over so we can let our hair down - oops that's not a problem now. geoff On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 10:40 +0800, Dave CROCKER wrote: > > On 11/8/2010 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote: > > The proposed experiment includes three parts. First, schedule all BOFs > > for Monday afternoon. Second, schedule WGs before we know which BOFs will > > be held. Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF > > proposal to ADs. > > > > Please let us know whether you support this experiment. > > > 1. Can you provide some rational for the details of the experiment? > > 2. Is one goal to maximize the attendance conflicts among BOFs? > > d/ >
- Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment The IESG
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Dave CROCKER
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Scott Brim
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Aaron Falk
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Geoff Mulligan
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Barry Leiba
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Henk Uijterwaal
- RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment gregory.cauchie
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Michael Richardson
- RE: BOF Attendance Minimization Bernard Aboba
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Russ Housley
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Pete Resnick
- Re: BOF Attendance Minimization Dave CROCKER
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Spencer Dawkins
- RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Ross Callon
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Kurt Zeilenga
- Provider-Aggregated vs Provider-Independent IPv6 … Templin, Fred L
- Re: Provider-Aggregated vs Provider-Independent I… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Geoff Mulligan
- RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment David Harrington
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Scott Brim
- RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment Eric Burger