IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

Aaron Falk <falk@bbn.com> Mon, 08 November 2010 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <falk@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DE63A6452; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:04:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ogf+dYmfQtlD; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51423A694D; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:04:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.89.254.17] (port=62569 helo=nut-2.local) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <falk@bbn.com>) id 1PFI2Y-0006QH-4b; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 22:05:02 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD768DC.5020309@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 11:05:00 +0800
From: Aaron Falk <falk@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com> <4CD76710.7050004@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CD76710.7050004@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 03:04:46 -0000

On 11/8/10 10:57 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 2010-11-08 15:26, The IESG wrote:
>>   First, schedule all BOFs  for Monday afternoon.
> Hmm. How many non-overlapping time slots? It would be extremely
> frustrating if there was a lot of overlap between BOFs. Some of us
> are interested in almost any new topic. My first reaction is to prefer
> the BOFs spread out. I'm not sure that concentrating them will reduce
> the problem of clashes.
>

Strongly agree!

  --aaron

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email