IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Mon, 08 November 2010 09:43 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4B328C0F6; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 01:43:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.285
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.285 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.669, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kxD7ebQLRJ70; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 01:43:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [67.23.6.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B0A28C0F2; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 01:43:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1A11343DD; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 04:47:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ca (marajade.sandelman.ca [127.0.0.1]) by marajade.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFFD98B1C; Mon, 8 Nov 2010 04:43:43 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: wgchairs@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
In-Reply-To: <4CD78986.6010502@ripe.net>
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com> <4CD7607E.8030705@bbn.com> <C58676BCA8DD4B818C8AA5778ECBAB18@23FX1C1> <AANLkTikusNxxhQA4WOjEiLZfRLR0EjG3=0mViKdq7pjQ@mail.gmail.com> <4CD78986.6010502@ripe.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.1; nmh 1.1; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 21)
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 04:43:43 -0500
Message-ID: <24819.1289209423@marajade.sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 09:43:25 -0000

>>>>> "Henk" == Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> writes:
    Henk> So, I'd take it a step further: Starting Monday morning, 2 of the 7
    Henk> or 8 meeting slots in each session are reserved for BOFs and the other
    Henk> 4 or 5 for WG meetings.  That way, we'll have all the BOFs done by
    Henk> Tuesday lunchtime, giving time to discuss the results during the week,
    Henk> and impact on the rest of the schedule is minimal.

I think this is the best idea.
If the rooms for the BOFs are clearly identified, then we can also
easily give the BOFs 1hr slots rather than the 2.5 hour slots that
occurs most mornings.

-- 
]       He who is tired of Weird Al is tired of life!           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
   Kyoto Plus: watch the video <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kzx1ycLXQSE>
	               then sign the petition.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email