IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

"Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com> Mon, 08 November 2010 04:58 UTC

Return-Path: <amalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4DC28C10D; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:58:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95a5rTObRrue; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:58:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ew0-f44.google.com (mail-ew0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A0A28C0E4; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:58:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ewy27 with SMTP id 27so2777761ewy.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:59:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e4addIAk4rvCESsrn9vSzKPgi3i3y8RkaMTpQQtJ/ck=; b=p2d/oV/rzU4iaE0LrDUWoemKU3EZSVgRRU4Xd8axiAe4SPdgj2tKJbD5m0fUAQf+TO 9p3t8Co7BoQWw0P6r8y2UT5Pzi4xz6vm/HX4dAVlrLCeqcHxgkaOFAUEn59s69PDACK6 FBh3scMN+3EGhFo9UGUUaJJ0EVbtZiLReN4Y4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aeGPswfr5d7woJ9cCr1iEVy9QS0aCqreSnn29HxzguntENOBAvHNp+aJVlcAxWuJFH xvAtsw3wa69Vc8+zVMcHRf1BazfzCCD8jqzVh2/E+RNiuVvKHg4E2HTTm2x5C2td6G7/ wdujQJwsNLvAWzlmNVLLxoIV0b41CHIW7vs0g=
Received: by 10.213.105.197 with SMTP id u5mr421829ebo.36.1289192342788; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 20:59:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.45.3 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:58:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C58676BCA8DD4B818C8AA5778ECBAB18@23FX1C1>
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com> <4CD7607E.8030705@bbn.com> <C58676BCA8DD4B818C8AA5778ECBAB18@23FX1C1>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <amalis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:58:42 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikusNxxhQA4WOjEiLZfRLR0EjG3=0mViKdq7pjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
To: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:45:07 -0800
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 04:58:44 -0000

Like others that have chimed in, I'm just concerned that it will be
difficult to attend multiple BOFs of interest if they're all scheduled
against each other.

Cheers,
Andy

On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 12:47 PM, David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> part of the justification is to have the BOF early in the week so
> people can discuss it during the week.
>
> dbh
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Richard L. Barnes
>> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:29 AM
>> To: ietf@ietf.org
>> Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org; The IESG
>> Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
>>
>> If we put the BOFs on Friday afternoon instead, wouldn't that
>> make the
>> attendance numbers an even stronger gauge of interest?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/8/10 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote:
>> > The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling
>> experiment.  The
>> > goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and
>> also provide
>> > more time to craft BOF proposals.
>> >
>> > The proposed experiment includes three parts.  First,
>> schedule all BOFs
>> > for Monday afternoon.  Second, schedule WGs before we know
>> which BOFs will
>> > be held.  Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF
>> > proposal to ADs.
>> >
>> > Please let us know whether you support this experiment.
>> Discussion is
>> > welcome on the mail list and the plenary on Wednesday evening.
>> >
>> > On behalf of the IESG,
>> > Russ Housley
>> >
>>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email