IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

"David Harrington" <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Mon, 08 November 2010 04:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EC73A6974 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:47:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdlJh6ua49xJ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:47:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.48]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E961C3A6971 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 20:47:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id UUVc1f0081zF43QA5UnfMh; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 04:47:39 +0000
Received: from 23FX1C1 ([130.129.69.106]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id UUnN1f0062HaM7E8kUnR5Y; Mon, 08 Nov 2010 04:47:37 +0000
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: "'Richard L. Barnes'" <rbarnes@bbn.com>, ietf@ietf.org
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com> <4CD7607E.8030705@bbn.com>
Subject: RE: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 12:47:29 +0800
Message-ID: <C58676BCA8DD4B818C8AA5778ECBAB18@23FX1C1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
In-Reply-To: <4CD7607E.8030705@bbn.com>
Thread-Index: Act+7MOlFqKm2x8jROeC8FDq5ZQPiQAEznaQ
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 20:45:07 -0800
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 04:47:20 -0000

Hi,

part of the justification is to have the BOF early in the week so
people can discuss it during the week.

dbh 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Richard L. Barnes
> Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 10:29 AM
> To: ietf@ietf.org
> Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org; The IESG
> Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
> 
> If we put the BOFs on Friday afternoon instead, wouldn't that 
> make the 
> attendance numbers an even stronger gauge of interest?
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/8/10 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote:
> > The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling 
> experiment.  The
> > goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and 
> also provide
> > more time to craft BOF proposals.
> >
> > The proposed experiment includes three parts.  First, 
> schedule all BOFs
> > for Monday afternoon.  Second, schedule WGs before we know 
> which BOFs will
> > be held.  Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF
> > proposal to ADs.
> >
> > Please let us know whether you support this experiment.  
> Discussion is
> > welcome on the mail list and the plenary on Wednesday evening.
> >
> > On behalf of the IESG,
> > Russ Housley
> >
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email