IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

"Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com> Mon, 08 November 2010 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <rbarnes@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661523A694F; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.634
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.634 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.035, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRXhpdnNTNpP; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B4E3A694C; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:29:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.89.253.162] (port=53631 helo=richards-MacBook-Pro.local) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <rbarnes@bbn.com>) id 1PFHU0-0006GL-CS; Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:29:20 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD7607E.8030705@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:29:18 +0800
From: "Richard L. Barnes" <rbarnes@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:29:02 -0000

If we put the BOFs on Friday afternoon instead, wouldn't that make the 
attendance numbers an even stronger gauge of interest?



On 11/8/10 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG is seriously considering a WG and BOF scheduling experiment.  The
> goal of the experiment is to provide WG agenda sooner and also provide
> more time to craft BOF proposals.
>
> The proposed experiment includes three parts.  First, schedule all BOFs
> for Monday afternoon.  Second, schedule WGs before we know which BOFs will
> be held.  Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF
> proposal to ADs.
>
> Please let us know whether you support this experiment.  Discussion is
> welcome on the mail list and the plenary on Wednesday evening.
>
> On behalf of the IESG,
> Russ Housley
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email