IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Mon, 08 November 2010 02:40 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFFE3A6934; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:40:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jh49j-VYDNIC; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209163A672F; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.131.232] (dhcp-83e8.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.131.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA82eAx7011913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 7 Nov 2010 18:40:18 -0800
Message-ID: <4CD76304.4090508@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 10:40:04 +0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposed WG and BOF Scheduling Experiment
References: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101108022649.BD7E03A694D@core3.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 07 Nov 2010 18:40:19 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wgchairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:40:00 -0000

On 11/8/2010 10:26 AM, The IESG wrote:
> The proposed experiment includes three parts.  First, schedule all BOFs
> for Monday afternoon.  Second, schedule WGs before we know which BOFs will
> be held.  Finally, provide an additional four weeks to deliver BOF
> proposal to ADs.
>
> Please let us know whether you support this experiment.


1.  Can you provide some rational for the details of the experiment?

2.  Is one goal to maximize the attendance conflicts among BOFs?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email