Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate

[Ralf Weber <[e-mail]>]

Moin!

On 13.02.2009, at 03:34, Willie Gillespie wrote:
> Not a bad idea.  In fact, it may be useful to have a unique "list"  
> per draft, so every comment relating to a particular draft can be  
> tracked historically.  This example is how I understand your  
> suggestion:
>
> [e-mail] will automatically be set up  
> with the initial ID submission.  E-mails sent to it will be regarded  
> as discussion pertaining to the draft.
>
> Individuals interested in following the draft may subscribe to that  
> list simply by sending an e-mail to it.  (However, e-mails with  
> simply the word "subscribe" in the body or subject line won't be  
> forwarded to everyone.)  They are also allowed to unsubscribe  
> (perhaps following
> the 48-hour waiting period of initial subscription as David  
> suggested).
>
> Note also that e-mails sent to [e-mail] would not be  
> sent to the general list of [e-mail].
I strongly disagree with that proposal. Some points only come up in  
the discussions about a draft. So if I hadn't subscribed to the draft  
mail list I would not become aware of that. I can see a point  
distinguishing between subscribers and non-subscribers to  
[e-mail], but what you are proposing here is like the working  
group emails list we have now and not what [e-mail] is about.

So long
-Ralf
---
Ralf Weber
Platform Infrastructure Manager
Colt Telecom GmbH
Herriotstrasse 4
60528 Frankfurt
Germany
DDI: [phone] Internal OneDial: 8 491 2780
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
http://www.colt.net/
Data | Voice | Managed Services

Schütze Deine Umwelt | Erst denken, dann drucken

*****************************************
COLT Telecom GmbH, Herriotstraße 4, 60528 Frankfurt/Main, Deutschland  
* Tel [phone] * Fax [phone] *

Geschäftsführer: Dr. Jürgen Hernichel (Vors.), Rita Thies *  
Amtsgericht Frankfurt/Main HRB 46123 * USt.-IdNr. DE 197 498 400