IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Wed, 24 April 2019 21:10 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E46112015C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PYHpqjRSJ-bL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lavender.maple.relay.mailchannels.net (lavender.maple.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.214.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 630051200E9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2579D3E5D59; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:10:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (unknown [100.96.16.23]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9E6093E600C; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:10:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:2500 (trex/5.17.2); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:10:34 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Descriptive-Left: 2afc58165ed0a897_1556140233912_1304951952
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1556140233912:2196984704
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1556140233911
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A2C809F0; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=FRyE50SJNw/2FN vYepxvxjSeiYQ=; b=vCxtcyOZgd9Z/2HQ68rqMKz55CHSC2gbfcjqNNUbc0WeJ0 2kpyhAvj5ON2pLTAjVD0wfpYbpawgCXsc8JEGBi4ZXc7IkH6oLstwAHiEhiuUDmz 6f7rdbiVigxKfUbVNcgkdFXzTRC8qn3058QtRj9BbPos2kddq8XVenURO7duE=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a80.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E287809B0; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:10:27 -0500
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a80
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: AD Sponsorship of draft-moonesamy-recall-rev
Message-ID: <20190424211026.GN3137@localhost>
References: <033d01d4f52f$c6f2dca0$54d895e0$@olddog.co.uk> <C7274EAB-7DDC-491F-9DD2-0CFFADB13CA9@cooperw.in> <72f00d0b-7ec6-ba6a-b17b-97879d457ae3@comcast.net> <CAKKJt-fOMMdM-mkbJaYpsH6XPCpatUkwZY-d_A+MaNa3nhaNDg@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBNdaWU4wwOK_MnWC5hOr7Lu3osmC_6_KKxB5fHuHVHyTw@mail.gmail.com> <23d54797-5c94-aa00-ec55-3f2c4fdfcfae@comcast.net> <6.2.5.6.2.20190424095017.13cdadc8@elandnews.com> <51068F13-E90F-42A2-8AE2-627D5E18B145@akamai.com> <20190424201939.GM3137@localhost> <CAA=duU0LfA9d1+p+myvwGFDXuQhNdP0iUAny22VCZF6p9Xdr8A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA=duU0LfA9d1+p+myvwGFDXuQhNdP0iUAny22VCZF6p9Xdr8A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
X-VR-OUT-STATUS: OK
X-VR-OUT-SCORE: -100
X-VR-OUT-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrhedvgdehgecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfftffgtefojffquffvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujggfsehttdertddtredvnecuhfhrohhmpefpihgtohcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceonhhitghosegtrhihphhtohhnvggtthhorhdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpeifihhkihhpvgguihgrrdhorhhgnecukfhppedvgedrvdekrddutdekrddukeefnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhhouggvpehsmhhtphdphhgvlhhopehlohgtrghlhhhoshhtpdhinhgvthepvdegrddvkedruddtkedrudekfedprhgvthhurhhnqdhprghthheppfhitghoucghihhllhhirghmshcuoehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmqedpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmpdhnrhgtphhtthhopehnihgtohestghrhihpthhonhgvtghtohhrrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ZWPdseHW-W-6HPGffuOwO61WMw4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 21:10:37 -0000

On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 04:59:12PM -0400, Andrew G. Malis wrote:
> What is the definition of a "frivolous" petition? Just curious how that
> would work...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_know_it_when_I_see_it

Still, I'd say something like: when the specifics of petitioner's
grievance is thin justification, perhaps personal in a way that doesn't
rise to the level justifying recall, petitioner's grievance easily
addressed in some other way than by recalling an officer, and so on.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email