Re: Hum theatre
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 07 November 2013 13:59 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EF311E823C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:59:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIFbb7sDZbYh for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:59:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5391F11E819C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:59:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.180] (d23-16-52-16.bchsia.telus.net [23.16.52.16] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA7DxQlT007834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 05:59:30 -0800
Message-ID: <527B9CA5.105@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:59:01 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Hum theatre
References: <527AF986.4090504@dcrocker.net> <CAHBU6iuDXQok_QRZe7BL__Vmkn447vUCSViDgrVkaedKAHcnfw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHBU6iuDXQok_QRZe7BL__Vmkn447vUCSViDgrVkaedKAHcnfw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:59:30 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:59:35 -0000
> You’re entitled to your opinion, but I entirely disagree. I was not offering an opinion. Survey methodology is an arcane and difficult technical specialty with a long, colorful and very problematic history. Research on its challenges is extensive and consistent. By way of a brief example, here's something from the survey professionals at Pew: http://www.people-press.org/methodology/questionnaire-design/question-wording/ > I sense a fair degree of process omphaloskepsis here. To the extent that it does not matter whether questions are asked ambiguously, responses are interpreted inconsistently and results used inappropriately, yes, I suppose these concerns represent idle reflection. To the extent that we care whether the IETF really does provide an environment that supports careful, meaningful consideration of issues, encourages the inclusion of differing opinions, and is judicious in its interpretation of comments, it is quite basic to the nature of the IETF. The point behind my including a single, alternative question at the end was to note that indulging in the exercise as theatre would have been fine if it hadn't purported to do more than that. From many of the comments that have been posted, it's quite clear that many folk think it was more than a closing bit of theatre. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- Re: Hum theatre Francis Dupont
- Re: Hum theatre Ted Lemon
- Hum theatre Dave Crocker
- Re: Hum theatre Yoav Nir
- Re: Hum theatre Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Hum theatre Tim Bray
- Re: Hum theatre Randy Bush
- Hum theatre Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Hum theatre Jorge Amodio
- Re: Hum theatre Larry Masinter
- Re: Hum theatre Ralph Droms
- Re: Hum theatre Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Hum theatre Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Hum theatre Pete Resnick
- Re: Hum theatre Stefan Winter
- Re: Hum theatre Martin J. Dürst
- Re: Hum theatre Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Hum theatre Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Hum theatre Stefan Winter
- Re: Hum theatre Richard Barnes
- Re: Hum theatre Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: Hum theatre Arturo Servin
- Re: Hum theatre Dave Crocker
- Re: Hum theatre Scott Brim
- Re: Hum theatre Randy Bush
- Re: Hum theatre Bob Hinden
- Re: Hum theatre Tim Bray
- Re: Hum theatre Randy Bush
- Re: Hum theatre Paul Hoffman
- Re: Hum theatre Scott Brim
- Re: Hum theatre Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
- Re: Hum theatre Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
- Re: Hum theatre Carsten Bormann
- Re: Hum theatre Dave Crocker
- Re: Hum theatre Pete Resnick
- Re: Hum theatre Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Hum theatre Jari Arkko
- Re: Hum theatre Jari Arkko
- Re: Hum theatre Richard Barnes
- Re: Hum theatre Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng)
- Re: Hum theatre Pete Resnick
- Re: Hum theatre Dave Cridland
- Re: Hum theatre Ted Lemon
- Re: Hum theatre Dave Crocker
- Re: Hum theatre Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Hum theatre Jorge Amodio