IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hum theatre

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr> Thu, 07 November 2013 06:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEFD11E8230 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:09:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h36MHkpmIi7I for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (givry.fdupont.fr [IPv6:2001:41d0:1:6d55:211:5bff:fe98:d51e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B874D11E8151 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 22:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from givry.fdupont.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by givry.fdupont.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rA769LlO022579; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 07:09:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dupont@givry.fdupont.fr)
Message-Id: <201311070609.rA769LlO022579@givry.fdupont.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: Hum theatre
In-reply-to: Your message of Wed, 06 Nov 2013 18:23:02 PST. <527AF986.4090504@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 07:09:21 +0100
Sender: Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 06:09:34 -0000

 In your previous mail you wrote:

>  Here's what I suggest:  A single, simple, conceptual question that 
>  supplies all of the 'guidance' we can legitimately offer, at this stage:
>  
>        The IETF needs to press for careful attention to privacy
>        concerns in its work, including protection against surveillance.
>  
>             [ ]  No
>             [X]  Yes
>             [ ]  Don't Yet Know
>             [ ]  Don't Care
>  

Francis.Dupont@fdupont.fr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email