Re: [rtcweb] Uppercase question for RFC2119 words

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Wed, 30 March 2016 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD06D12D5AF; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bLD3nE65tENC; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E4712D5B8; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.230] (c-73-252-132-48.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.252.132.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u2UH3uve005719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:03:57 -0700
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Uppercase question for RFC2119 words
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
References: <20160320223116.8946.76840.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8BADEAFFC7@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <CA+9kkMCsT43ZCSdq8gdKXu1k4pJgbf0ab5tE=dDiFfrTT2gtkA@mail.gmail.com> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8BADEB0D16@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <56F79D05.8070004@alvestrand.no> <326E6502-28E5-4D09-BB99-4A5D80625EB0@stewe.org> <56F88E18.2060506@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <20160328104731.GO88304@verdi> <CALaySJ+hYMMsKE7Ws-NJbyqH55E-mQM-duTEcJGc0TWvTP88Ew@mail.gmail.com> <20160328132859.GP88304@verdi> <28975138-9EA1-4A9F-A6C0-BC1416B8EA44@sobco.com> <CALaySJJkNj2jfm0gJpuDzq8oFDjTNn-uQ5MHdmEOLwTiFZUyQQ@mail.gmail.com> <56FBDE33.5000706@nostrum.com> <56FBE3F2.10507@dcrocker.net> <CAKHUCzyhUwxvk3sQzZGHHZf-vh8B9wtp4DQ9qRcJ0sdi3o1UNw@mail.gmail.com> <56FC0441.5090207@nostrum.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <56FC06F5.5090100@bbiw.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:03:49 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56FC0441.5090207@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/dnELO0-k6tfNO_qpt-ndtHvVJgs>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>, "Heather Flanagan \(RFC Series Editor\)" <rse@rfc-editor.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:04:03 -0000

On 3/30/2016 9:52 AM, Adam Roach wrote:
> On 3/30/16 11:32, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> Finally, I'd note in passing that "bill" and "Bill", "will" and
>> "Will", "heather" and "Heather", all have different semantics based on
>> case - not that this is particular relevant.
>
> It's actually quite relevant, since it shows that we already have
> significant cases in which merely changing letter case can alter meaning
> nontrivially.


Except that the assertion that case alters meeting is wrong.  The 
examples given were wrong, adam.


d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net