Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review and comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 22 January 2009 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAEA28C29F; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:43:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE71F28C291; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:43:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.512
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.512 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.087, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E53DQQ+T8mYS; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:43:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.168]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC03928C1FA; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so5040090wfd.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:43:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=L1KMlSVv5yM1eNCVGKBB+leYNA3PFnsh616RH8SWl/A=; b=F3u/+tD8Z8CDgZIafAD2Aa3rtCoEpJhlj0A7vhoUDVJozCIc10t0gmi9mqKaYHon6r bE+cL4Ai16sfjWd1DzWxJ02vW7rt5FI5x/Xxl1WYdIbWW3eOQukLp/UfuKoCihmW+UBR 1C6GWItgz77EP1itXMIo2gFAyupbg7pUeGfsw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=MDrnCtpLddSy79J1VXToCFnmTvSQlXwabU+CTv58UH59hnyVPywChkaA0SRlg0K7YN YyVcOkYkLOqZp+rKCQnXAVbcdHPngpQtrA3i6aA9fHff27nw3uu3AT5u8VjTtCfdONt/ qCujJ9fmmfddd8U1wK8Zufa6Z5LFWLuCZKYVo=
Received: by 10.142.199.16 with SMTP id w16mr1272091wff.4.1232657006206; Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:43:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?130.216.38.124? (stf-brian.sfac.auckland.ac.nz [130.216.38.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm19992792wfg.48.2009.01.22.12.43.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:43:25 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4978DA6B.7000409@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 09:43:23 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review and comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem
References: <70873A2B7F744826B0507D4B84903E60@noisy> <54974382E5FF41D3A40EFDF758DB8C49@DGBP7M81> <20090112211809.515993A67EA@core3.amsl.com> <A2460A3CBF9453B10BC02375@PST.jck.com> <20090112221608.5659A3A67EA@core3.amsl.com> <7FCA5612-AACD-404A-A454-E72AB9A5F51E@softarmor.com> <6.1.2.0.2.20090121100156.02670878@boreas.isi.edu> <BE12AE47-BC5C-495C-BBE1-EA16D6442DB1@gbiv.com> <4978A171.6030904@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4978A171.6030904@gmx.de>
Cc: trustees@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org Julian,

On 2009-01-23 05:40, Julian Reschke wrote:
...
> That leaves us with the question whether any contributor (IPR-wise)
> needs to be called "author". Not sure about that. But if we don't call
> them authors, they should be listed in a agreed-upon place in the spec.

For minor contributors, the Acknowledgments section seems appropriate,
and that follows normal practice in all kinds of publications.

> Because of the IPR implications, that probably should also include
> contact info, just as for authors.

That would only arise for pre-RFC5378 text that is subject to the
disclaimer clause *and* fails a "fair use" test. But it isn't much use
anyway - the contact info in almost every older RFC is obsolete.

    Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf