ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review and comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem
"Ed Juskevicius" <edj.etc@gmail.com> Thu, 08 January 2009 21:43 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9113A69D1; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:43:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C995F3A6990; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:43:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.666
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.666 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N6K3UOCVgVcC; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:43:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B303A67CC; Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:43:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c5so3245154anc.4 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:43:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:x-priority:x-msmail-priority :x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole:importance; bh=fJTJS3cAryI6uj/JYy+1cY/PI/FBceiKTp4Xf2y0MCM=; b=aWPSO5YWQhergfJ+i1at6ieucxPMm9mRWql5OKVYaEfXMqWcCK7AFSfBnHtd2+qvnT kXX2Y2KoN1Bhjnt91CKx1JgoOvDXg3BQwpH/M6QysGk8+wxqrPHM0rOPrLDp/4/gNTR6 2BD2n/3LluDLZGJW2ak0UejBZ1cXkVomXut0g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :x-priority:x-msmail-priority:x-mailer:thread-index:x-mimeole :importance; b=H+/k2YGtz/kV9nq4ssIFxqFPFf9YSDVorhuX55F2vbU1tsD+7dOnLolGy6h5qws8kz Wn85Ar1fOGY4TwmMvCw0uyjj0r2ZvoAari5M/FzLGB76C9Wwa4Ej+MtG4sK0GmpPISQL Qqvh5PI6QTEKn0tEqavG/7/7nZ7/KoZ2cdFl8=
Received: by 10.65.97.18 with SMTP id z18mr17831549qbl.11.1231450997994; Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:43:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from noisy (bas3-ottawa23-1177594413.dsl.bell.ca [70.48.170.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k27sm56383273qba.22.2009.01.08.13.43.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:43:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Ed Juskevicius <edj.etc@gmail.com>
To: 'IETF Discussion' <ietf@ietf.org>, ietf-announce@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, iab@iab.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, wgchairs@ietf.org
Subject: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your review and comments on a proposed Work-Around to the Pre-5378 Problem
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:43:50 -0500
Message-ID: <70873A2B7F744826B0507D4B84903E60@noisy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0020_01C971B0.4A1BABC0"
X-Priority: 1 (Highest)
X-MSMail-Priority: High
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AclxuETcvNCPupucRASslmyMepJprwAFxkPA
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
Importance: High
Cc: 'Trustees' <trustees@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
The purpose of this message is twofold: 1) To summarize the issues that some members of our community have experienced since the publication of RFC 5378 in November 2008, and 2) To invite community review and discussion on a potential work-around being considered by the IETF Trustees. Some I-D authors are having difficulty implementing RFC 5378. An example of the difficulty is as follows: - an author wants to include pre-5378 content in a new submission or contribution to the IETF, but - s/he is not certain that all of the author(s) of the earlier material have agreed to license it to the IETF Trust according to RFC 5378. If an I-D author includes pre-5378 material in a new document, then s/he must represent or warrant that all of the authors who created the pre-5378 material have granted rights for that material to the IETF Trust. If s/he cannot make this assertion, then s/he has a problem. This situation has halted the progression of some Internet-Drafts and interrupted the publication of some RFCs. The Trustees of the IETF Trust are investigating ways to implement a temporary work-around so that IETF work can continue to progress. A permanent solution to this "pre-5378 problem" may require an update to RFC 5378, for example new work by the community to create a 5378-bis document. The remainder of this message provides an outline of the temporary work- around being considered by the Trustees. RFC 5378 sections 1.j and 5.3.c provide the IETF Trust with the authority to develop legend text for authors to use in situations where they wish to limit the granting of rights to modify and prepare derivatives of the documents they submit. The Trustees used this authority in 2008 to develop and adopt the current "Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents" which are posted at: http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/. The Trustees are now considering the creation of optional new legend text which could be used by authors experiencing the "pre-5378 problem". The new legend text, if implemented, would do the following: a. Provide Authors and Contributors with a way to identify (to the IETF Trust) that their contributions contain material from pre-5378 documents for which RFC 5378 rights to modify the material outside the IETF standards process may not have been granted, and b. Provide the IETF Trust and the community with a clear indication of every document containing pre-5378 content and having the "pre-5378 problem". So, how could the creation and use of some new legend text help people work-around the pre-5378 problem? The proposed answer is as follows: 1. Anyone having a contribution with the "pre-5378" problem should add new legend text to the contribution, to clearly flag that it includes pre-5378 material for which all of the rights needed under RFC 5378 may not have been granted, and 2. The IETF Trust will consider authors and contributors (with the pre-5378 problem) to have met their RFC 5378 obligations if the new legend text appears on their documents, and 3. Authors and contributors should only resort to adding the new legend text to their documents (per #1) if they cannot develop certainty that all of the author(s) of pre-5378 material in their documents have agreed to license the pre-5378 content to the IETF Trust according to RFC 5378. The proposed wording for the new legend text is now available for your review and comments in section 6.c.iii of a draft revision to the IETF Trust's "Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents" located at http://trustee.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html. Please note that the above document also contains new text in section 5.c dealing with "License Limitations". If your review and feedback on this proposed work-around is positive, then the new text may be adopted by the Trustees in early February 2009, and then be published as an official revision to the Legal Provisions document. If so adopted, Internet-Drafts with pre-5378 material may advance within the Internet standards process and get published as RFCs where otherwise qualified to do so. Unless covered by sections 6.c.i or 6.c.ii, authors of documents in which there is no pre-5378 material must provide a RFC 5378 license with no limitation on modifications outside the IETF standards process. The IETF Trust will not grant the right to modify or prepare derivative works of any specific RFC or other IETF Contribution outside the IETF standards process until RFC 5378 rights pertaining to that document have been obtained from all authors and after compliance by the IETF Trust with RFC 5377. The Trustees will establish one or more mechanisms by which authors of pre-5378 documents may grant RFC 5378 rights. The Trustees hereby invite your review, comments and suggestions on this proposed work-around to the "pre-5378 problem". The period for this review is 30 days. Microsoft WORD and PDF versions of the proposed revisions are attached to this message. Copies are also available on the IETF Trust website under the heading "DRAFT Policy and Procedures Being Developed" at: http://trustee.ietf.org/policyandprocedures.html All feedback submitted before the end of February 7th will be considered by the Trustees. A decision on whether to move forward with this proposal will be made and communicated to you before the end of February 15th. Please give this your attention. Regards and Happy New Year ! Ed Juskevicius, on behalf of the IETF Trustees edj.etc@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your revie… Ed Juskevicius
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… TSG
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Stephen Farrell
- RE: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Ed Juskevicius
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Thomas Narten
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Thomas Narten
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Fred Baker
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John Leslie
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Lawrence Rosen
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Jeffrey Hutzelman
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Lawrence Rosen
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Ted Hardie
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Lawrence Rosen
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… ned+ietf
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Theodore Tso
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Bill Manning
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Theodore Tso
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Lawrence Rosen
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Dave CROCKER
- A long-term meta-fix (was: Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNC… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… ned+ietf
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Bill Manning
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Bill Manning
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Lawrence Rosen
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Theodore Tso
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… TSG
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Simon Josefsson
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Simon Josefsson
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Fred Baker
- 5378 - one purpose Black_David
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… David Harrington
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Russ Housley
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… John C Klensin
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Russ Housley
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Russ Housley
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Ed Juskevicius
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Ed Juskevicius
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Stephan Wenger
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Randy Presuhn
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Martin Duerst
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Julian Reschke
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Russ Housley
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… TSG
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Russ Housley
- RE: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Contreras, Jorge
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Tom.Petch
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Russ Housley
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Bill Fenner
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Russ Housley
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Tom.Petch
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Tom.Petch
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Russ Housley
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Dean Willis
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… John C Klensin
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Doug Ewell
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Russ Housley
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Russ Housley
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [Trustees] ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees in… Theodore Tso
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Bob Braden
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Roy T. Fielding
- Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNOUNCE… Julian Reschke
- Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNO… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNO… Theodore Tso
- Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNO… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNO… Simon Josefsson
- Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNO… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNO… Simon Josefsson
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… Dean Willis
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: The IETF Trustees invite your r… John C Klensin
- Re: Editors vs Authors vs Contributors, was: ANNO… Julian Reschke