Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile

Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com> Thu, 26 July 2018 02:14 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@strayalpha.com>
X-Original-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: int-area@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0B2130EAA; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:14:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.989
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.989 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=strayalpha.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n_nvgDS6lQ4S; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from server217-3.web-hosting.com (server217-3.web-hosting.com [198.54.115.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59618130E3C; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=strayalpha.com; s=default; h=To:References:Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/rwrfpmaSNjtNtb0qdk8jAk1pzbdsPtHlcMUTzNu03I=; b=EP/QiZewAKRTV0Xawnk7CpShE 8tK/aSUdQ6H8S5MIJG9jp9iq5YpVwMrWW+21Pbcno+d2Z77Ee0YSWc9AfMF3r0414AuiGDxO+o0xP KAhdFm5BLpIQ3/rb07pYRE8YLLptgUrTJalweyOVRW+f0NrDvtrT1/JO/Ve99cPlFxahs0De6Q1N5 oeQJJRQ2e7A6Y/GPgM0dA/zdRFzJe18DzUKOnIDCsff+4Q+eFzdMIE/f5DTc5BX5XfwFh473Z4OBE 3f5+YZG1jy71cRc3I4+JqVxFDqBwRJjQ9VPcH0XrcHpokHj5Lh5fQsKlR1g/eMuEbnKYup32/VMk9 H5J5+aLcQ==;
Received: from cpe-172-250-240-132.socal.res.rr.com ([172.250.240.132]:52705 helo=[192.168.1.77]) by server217.web-hosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <touch@strayalpha.com>) id 1fiVnf-000o30-0x; Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:14:46 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Joe Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <F227637E-B12D-45AA-AD69-74C947409012@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 19:14:42 -0700
Cc: "internet-area@ietf.org" <int-area@ietf.org>, "intarea-chairs@ietf.org" <intarea-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0466770D-C8CA-49BB-AC10-5805CFDFB165@strayalpha.com>
References: <F227637E-B12D-45AA-AD69-74C947409012@ericsson.com>
To: Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server217.web-hosting.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - strayalpha.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server217.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: server217.web-hosting.com: touch@strayalpha.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-area/2cd6Gwh8UZ1IuQWsWZA8iOME9Zs>
Subject: Re: [Int-area] WG Adoption Call: IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile
X-BeenThere: int-area@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Internet Area Mailing List <int-area.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/int-area/>
List-Post: <mailto:int-area@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area>, <mailto:int-area-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 02:14:51 -0000

Hi, all,

I still think it would be useful for this doc to describe how tunnels interact with fragmentation (per draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels), which seems to be something I’ve noted several times before.

I’m also still not thrilled with the title I’d be happier with “IP fragmentation still not supported per requirements”, and I’d have to see where this goes with final recommendations.

But I agree *some* statement is worthwhile here. My primary concern is that if we’re not careful, endorsing the status quo will only ensure nothing changes.

So I sincerely hope that some of the strongest recommendations here are that both direct IP devices and tunnel ingress/egress devices need to do a better job of supporting fragmentation, and that protocol/device designers SHOULD avoid mechanisms that are not compatible with fragmentation (e.g., NAT or DPI without doing reassembly first).

Joe

> On Jul 24, 2018, at 12:42 PM, Wassim Haddad <wassim.haddad@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> We would like to start a WG adoption call for draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile (“IP Fragmentation Considered Fragile”).
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-bonica-intarea-frag-fragile-03.txt
> 
> 
> Please indicate your preferences on the mailling list. The deadline is August 10th.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Juan & Wassim
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> Int-area@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area