Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Fri, 11 February 2005 04:16 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA26843 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:16:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CzSYT-0003k5-IV for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:37:22 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CzSDV-00072M-Rw; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:15:41 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CzSBW-0006LJ-Id for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:13:38 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id XAA26494 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:13:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from machshav.com ([147.28.0.16]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CzSVd-0003ex-LZ for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:34:26 -0500
Received: by machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 512) id 724A3FB277; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:13:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from berkshire.machshav.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5E4FB246; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:13:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berkshire.machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B213C03BA; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:13:32 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:53:48 PST." <077401c50fed$64afdd40$84c2480c@gw>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 23:13:32 -0500
Message-Id: <20050211041332.97B213C03BA@berkshire.machshav.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7d33c50f3756db14428398e2bdedd581
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3

In message <077401c50fed$64afdd40$84c2480c@gw>, "todd glassey" writes:
>By the way - if a document filed for publication with the IETF has a
>code-clip from some other copyrighted document, isn't this an issue as far
>as the authors re-conveying rights they dont own to the IETF? What I mean is
>dont you need a formal release from the cited copyright holder for the code
>clip to?
>

Section 5.1 of 3667 requires submitters to include this text:

   "By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
   patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
   and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
   RFC 3668."

Copyright would certainly be covered by "other IPR".  In other words, I 
don't disagree with you, but I do feel that it's already covered.

		--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg