Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

"todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net> Fri, 11 February 2005 15:59 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA10307 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:59:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CzdXF-0001zb-AB for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:20:50 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Czd3i-0002AK-50; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:50:18 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Czcsp-0006uo-Kr for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:39:03 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA08625 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:39:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CzdD3-0001Ph-S8 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:59:59 -0500
Received: from gw (24.san-jose-09-10rs.ca.dial-access.att.net[12.72.195.24]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <20050211153824113002m43oe>; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:38:24 +0000
Message-ID: <002201c5104f$bde88440$010aff0a@gw>
From: todd glassey <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>
To: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
References: <20050211041332.97B213C03BA@berkshire.machshav.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:38:23 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

So Steven- the IETF is supposed to believe the person submitting the
materials??? - What is the damage to the original owner if the person is
lying. What is the damage? - the point is that the ENTIRE IETF process is
based on TRUST and no other in the world is. No financial payment system is
based on "well trust you to do it". No other IP Conveyance or release
process is.

I think this is exactly where we formally set in the historical record of
the IETF and IESG that the IETF must not just blindly believe without basic
releases, anything sent to it, or that it and the IESG are willing to accept
the financial damages that their lack of anything like reasonable diligence
provides here. Or, that its not and that there is an implicit damager to the
actual IP Owners in participating in the IETF.

This is it - Steven thanks!

Todd Glassey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>
Cc: <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; "Scott Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt


> In message <077401c50fed$64afdd40$84c2480c@gw>, "todd glassey" writes:
> >By the way - if a document filed for publication with the IETF has a
> >code-clip from some other copyrighted document, isn't this an issue as
far
> >as the authors re-conveying rights they dont own to the IETF? What I mean
is
> >dont you need a formal release from the cited copyright holder for the
code
> >clip to?
> >
>
> Section 5.1 of 3667 requires submitters to include this text:
>
>    "By submitting this Internet-Draft, I certify that any applicable
>    patent or other IPR claims of which I am aware have been disclosed,
>    and any of which I become aware will be disclosed, in accordance with
>    RFC 3668."
>
> Copyright would certainly be covered by "other IPR".  In other words, I
> don't disagree with you, but I do feel that it's already covered.
>
> --Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
>
>


_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg