IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> Mon, 21 February 2005 02:43 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA08593 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:43:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D33tm-0001FL-LD for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 22:06:16 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D332E-0003Yu-1k; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:10:54 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D32nG-0007uK-Dw for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:55:26 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA04522 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 20:55:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from 178.230.13.217.in-addr.dgcsystems.net ([217.13.230.178] helo=yxa.extundo.com ident=root) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D339M-0008MZ-23 for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 21:18:17 -0500
Received: from latte.josefsson.org (c494102a.s-bi.bostream.se [217.215.27.65]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa.extundo.com (8.13.2/8.13.2/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j1L1t29i001841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 02:55:03 +0100
From: Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com>
To: sob@harvard.edu
References: <iluacq9uxow.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <20050218144738.8264F225E7F@newdev.harvard.edu>
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:21:050221:sob@harvard.edu::xJ1BIIDJU/jJL0K8:7a+B
X-Hashcash: 1:21:050221:neroden@twcny.rr.com::5jPuqs2s9K/8lHHp:6ovk
X-Hashcash: 1:21:050221:ipr-wg@ietf.org::cChLGo2SWHduvkZn:Xf6X
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 02:54:55 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20050218144738.8264F225E7F@newdev.harvard.edu> (Scott Bradner's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:47:38 -0500 (EST)")
Message-ID: <ilu3bvqsmmo.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=failed version=3.0.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on yxa-iv
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.81, clamav-milter version 0.81b on yxa.extundo.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org, neroden@twcny.rr.com
Subject: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b

sob@harvard.edu (Scott Bradner) writes:

>> I think the argument has been explained already, but to me it appears
>> to be that some people believe that permitting third parties to modify
>> IETF documents will somehow lead to negative consequences.  I can't
>> explain the arguments for this position, because I don't believe they
>> are valid.  I hope that Scott Bradner, or someone else, will
>> elaborate.
>
> reasons are elaborated in the ID (you may not agree but please don't
> pretend that no arguments have been made)

I don't see anyone pretending that no arguments have been made.

I am saying that I don't understand nor agree with your arguments.

I tried to start a discussion in:

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ipr/2597

but you didn't reply.

Mentioning arguments in an ID doesn't make them true, and especially
so when there is no discussion.

The arguments in your ID appear to even make people uninterested in
participating in the discussion, see:

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.legal/19309

I am sincerely hoping you will take the time to discuss your thoughts
on this further.

Thanks,
Simon

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email