IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> Fri, 11 February 2005 01:10 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14674 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:10:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CzPe3-00009A-W5 for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:30:57 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CzPBG-0006C7-J9; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:01:10 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CzPAa-0005zF-Jw for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:28 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14166 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from machshav.com ([147.28.0.16]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CzPUg-0008Py-NU for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:21:15 -0500
Received: by machshav.com (Postfix, from userid 512) id 4D258FB282; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:23 -0500 (EST)
Received: from berkshire.machshav.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA955FB27C; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by berkshire.machshav.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E7F3C02A5; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:21 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
To: sob@harvard.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:18:47 EST." <20050211001847.BC1ED212D25@newdev.harvard.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:00:21 -0500
Message-Id: <20050211010021.48E7F3C02A5@berkshire.machshav.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32

In message <20050211001847.BC1ED212D25@newdev.harvard.edu>, Scott Bradner write
s:
>
>I've just published draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt 
>
>this ID addresses the issues of extracting RFCs and derivative works
>
>this is meant to stimulate discussion but is not a WG document
>because it is not an even-handed treatment 
>
>I expect it to be discussed during teh IPR WG session
>

Yes -- it's on the draft agenda Scott Brim and I have been working on.  
(I won't be in Minneapolis; Scott [B[rim]] will be the chair pro tem.)


		--Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb



_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email