Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

By the way - if a document filed for publication with the IETF has a
code-clip from some other copyrighted document, isn't this an issue as far
as the authors re-conveying rights they dont own to the IETF? What I mean is
dont you need a formal release from the cited copyright holder for the code
clip to?

Just a thought.

Todd

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott Bradner" <sob@harvard.edu>
To: <ipr-wg@ietf.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

>
> Bill desires:
>
>    - code changes to make RFC-derived code pass various static or dynamic
>      checkers (lint, purify, gcc -Wall, ...)
>
>    - changes to make it match local conventions for indentation,
identifier
>      naming, header file naming, etc.,
>
>    - changes to eliminate global variables, add locking for multithread
>      safety, or allow for localized messages.
>
>    - Translations into other programming languages or to cope with the
>      evolution of the programming language (e.g., the K&R C to standard C
>      transition).
>
> I like all of these - can you suggest a generic way to say the above?
> (listing specific cases seems to be a way that will not scale)
>
> Scott
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ipr-wg mailing list
> Ipr-wg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg