Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt

Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> Sat, 12 February 2005 17:15 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA15954 for <ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:15:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1D01CX-0006zs-SX for ipr-wg-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:37:03 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1D00nt-0003oT-VE; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:11:33 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CzpRe-0006oF-Tc for ipr-wg@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:50 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA01580 for <ipr-wg@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com ([24.24.2.56]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Czplz-0000Qd-9O for ipr-wg@ietf.org; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:24:52 -0500
Received: from doctormoo (cpe-24-59-108-18.twcny.res.rr.com [24.59.108.18]) by ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1C53jJj024147; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: by doctormoo (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F166543BF9; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
To: sommerfeld@sun.com
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 00:03:52 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200502120003.52511.neroden@twcny.rr.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:11:32 -0500
Cc: ipr-wg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPR-WG <ipr-wg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipr-wg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg>, <mailto:ipr-wg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipr-wg-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

sommerfeld@sun.com wrote:
>More importantly, both the "desert island" and the "dissident" tests presume
>that the people enforcing the license are mindless automatons and would seek
>to enforce it even when it would be unjust or destructive to the aims of the 
>IETF to do so. 

Actually, this is a basic principle of reading licenses.

We cannot rely on the license issuer to remain sane forever.  Given the long 
duration of copyright, if we want rights, we need them explicitly present in 
a written license.  An oral contract isn't worth the paper it's written on, 
as the saying goes.

_______________________________________________
Ipr-wg mailing list
Ipr-wg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipr-wg