Re: Reinventing Site-Locals

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 27 April 2019 18:33 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C9012006B for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:33:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xecBw5iTS9BJ for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC86B120049 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3RIXSNC027784; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:33:28 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D4CF7200CFC; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F8A200C2A; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.86.2] ([132.166.86.2]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3RIXRXZ014502; Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:33:28 +0200
Subject: Re: Reinventing Site-Locals
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <bb7f7606-2adf-e669-8bcd-e41f17800782@gmail.com> <6bd5db47-408a-727e-5c13-f34a3465f986@si6networks.com> <CAJE_bqfTLqRbLp4fLu2ASZuZ+4G5c2G+RXkO92kXfLgPTqBnng@mail.gmail.com> <EEF00EA7-2AAF-403F-99AD-1D53ED18E8B3@cisco.com> <CAJE_bqe8OXPWRDvXEY66gZHiBgv37OV67YB27WoEtq_VmBqieQ@mail.gmail.com> <3F852B26-FD19-445D-A8E9-94BCBB9BE7C1@gmail.com> <455C3D20-E71B-4DF4-837E-081964E3328A@gmail.com> <19275484-3fa5-7c4e-3624-b861ddea6e2f@gmail.com> <2B1FBA08-3DDB-4287-B2B4-11324334B7FC@employees.org> <5b3f148a-3f61-66ea-716a-9f29cb4de346@gmail.com> <m1hJazF-0000ILC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <b6cb92ac-859e-cf8a-d4cf-1115ff7a8241@gmail.com> <b810937b-8989-1c61-89b8-2b8ee176587a@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2z+SYZnf2TztPVW3h6mZFj6B8BKqDsa=vcsLJ1gmz6gpQ@mail.gmail.com> <7131ea21-1a0c-ebe7-d08b-50747f8c4229@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2yuh3jtU6YJMoyCOruZozyyEgTxeeBpot2jqMW5S=zWfw@mail.gmail.com> <6c84b452-ff6b-373d-2efb-9f4e337f0a5d@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2w_gk4yyrBhXydeB4P+9FV4XzqyKcib1_JspZ+xxYxeew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <19a567ed-84f3-ec73-39d6-9af255642bc9@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:33:23 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2w_gk4yyrBhXydeB4P+9FV4XzqyKcib1_JspZ+xxYxeew@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/EhLRJlHc2Lz9BL0GMcwzetKZuu0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:33:34 -0000

Le 27/04/2019 à 04:19, Mark Smith a écrit :
[...]

>>>> (because the numerous computers in these three cars are not all on a
>>>> single subnet; they are all interconnected with IP, but there are
>>>> multiple subnets with routers in between).
>>>>
>>>
> 
> Right. This confirms my suspicion. If you got us to add Subnet IDs to
> Link-Local addresses, I'm confident you'd next be lobbying them to be
> routeable across different links attached to routers.

No, your assumption is wrong.

Let me reassure you, I want this: I want the link-local addresses to 
stay on a single link, in the same subnet.  Pinging them ok makes the 
logic of deciding whether the subnet set up was correctly done (channel 
number, MHz).

If these were ULAs, or site-locals, then the IP forwarding would have 
also played a role that is a difficult to consider.  It is not good to 
use IP forwarding to construct subnets, but to forward between them.

Again: I do not want site-locals.

> In other words, you'd want these Link-Local addresses to have a scope
> that is greater than a link.

No.  I want the link-local addresses that have a Subnet ID inside to 
have a link scope.

> We used to have an address space for that, called the Site-Local address space.
> 
> Read why they were deprecated and then replaced by ULAs in RFC 3879.

I was in the room, I voted no to deprecation.

But I then thid agree with the IETF recommendation and removed all 
site-locals from my deployment.  Then I also removed 6to4.  I am happy 
about these decisions.

But for SubnetID-in-LL the situation is different.

> You won't like that they're easy to type, however that is the cost of
> solving all of the issues described in RFC 3879.

No.

Given that I do not want Site Local addresses, as explained above, do 
you still want me to read RFC3879?

In turn, let me bring back your suspicion: you suspect the car network I 
build needs Site Locals because you think this is disconnected from the 
Internet.  Do you know why this car network is disconnected from the 
IPv6 Internet?

Alex