IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: about violation of standards

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 24 April 2019 14:31 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7840D12016A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HjgbwE06iHfU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37390120020 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3OEVQ2F039119; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:31:26 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D86F6203F88; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:31:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC223201FBF; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:31:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3OEVQkt002124; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:31:26 +0200
Subject: Re: about violation of standards
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <bb7f7606-2adf-e669-8bcd-e41f17800782@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd9frqX5-yeVPj8MYXpZ4737HqK1gmfD9cQV3A-Ea5HrQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKQ4NaWLGh3f_dN6WVNnYs9fKL8=vfpnShAK8AczPo8LE8LjFA@mail.gmail.com> <a7ef29b1-09ff-d4da-d802-6f0ccfc2d4f3@gmail.com> <4786ccac-9633-932b-badb-ca89ab15cd73@foobar.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7c416dde-f2f7-9e25-dd52-f5ec9071a948@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:31:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4786ccac-9633-932b-badb-ca89ab15cd73@foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/TyAld3DtXly9EgZhmAVWCOkaCGY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:31:36 -0000


Le 23/04/2019 à 00:04, Nick Hilliard a écrit :
> Alexandre Petrescu wrote on 22/04/2019 20:38:
>> I would like to add something else: the implementation that does
>> _not_ allow the users to add fe80:1::1 (BSD) does not complain
>> about it.  It silently refuses.
> 
> this is expected behaviour on BSD (Kame derivatives?). fe80::/10 
> configuration is controlled by the "ifconfig XX auto_linklocal" 
> directive.  If auto_linklocal is configured, then the kernel will 
> automatically configure the fe80::/64 prefix.  You cannot configure
> the value directly.

YEt the link-local addresses should have the ability to be manually 
configured too, I guess.

Or are the LLs forbidden to be manually configured?

Alex

> 
> Nick
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email