IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: about violation of standards

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Thu, 18 April 2019 22:36 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5877120137 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id soS4nD_kl9yb for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x22c.google.com (mail-oi1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7DC12011D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id i21so2804429oib.11 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+IUnVa0F5FEALR7p4M2w2fTu4TtjUl2ms9plhHZNjjE=; b=fsJvyueQ1Ng/8jEdfOCFLB4+n8H/G5KDv9v50EoqZb4yBXB3PPfBpdvBvvqBpQRz5Y KkdXoODxfytSC8RcgoUUmgtmWgouUBIzluwlYMb7Re2Avp8uNjzys765CWey/oVpfAGA cq/ywN3h7pyoVqmGb5BJQzNcyxMiplhw/5fbKNS8OHbGiboGxrZm7iTFiP+bL0wUdCJ/ OcxyoouWUJ2m6PL9nJ3hYjeqDVjkqmq8Nm3oA0F3kps5qDwrEio33aCuuHg+uiGMZnqw pAJ5Ji8jAUcAjp+TsW23g7Cc24xGlOnfT/G5HTjTjCJqB26Yxj5YcZMN5hc+7HUL3fTp LUqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+IUnVa0F5FEALR7p4M2w2fTu4TtjUl2ms9plhHZNjjE=; b=gSS2oesAnPk3mSMFF0mNkjC1Mrb9Am7CrS1eZcnw2w238i0IxBPD6aHZ0rKeakxhu5 9OPzgA9ruBAPQ6XewlyeCZQbI4FT8cX32m4vokA39xiZQezgmIcbvQeqNig35X1Wt4kk xGmHtnOTQGt29QCR0zH67WilZtM9lQuIYzE7N9lSdn7lGHAQd5QV0oCcO0o2xeEeD0hv 7PWaE5pgs2eF9gGwbrGfiXkVY5GGaC33WORdNeyYLyf334LnQjEVXIT/RCpbwa42sD4p Vg6jjvOBam9tthY2Sn4HMfd/QwB7y1mA+WTrsKf6NjNrHakbgu60TByau/T6mgIV+EMx 5Aew==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV9CCWKgB8qCTgjB5zoiJyIMOtZxbTcRl1xQejMszjs/8B1dQwS LOoKsJ+vBjwrnPv3sMOPjoBjlM4O8W8hAX6zt/s=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxWAVfJWhuczoEGadQGvNz4g3EOqSCKPjqn/HizfoPS1dcD7SIw8IxT5N6VdTJh4aZQdE4RbAKJcVvgamnyeJ0=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:bfc2:: with SMTP id p185mr157278oif.38.1555626984951; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:36:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <bb7f7606-2adf-e669-8bcd-e41f17800782@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bb7f7606-2adf-e669-8bcd-e41f17800782@gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:06:13 +0930
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2xJPSCy+fe6qhSfafGoO31OagGu4A6L-od6Yunfbj0VZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: about violation of standards
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d756340586d5a1e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/FYlWcqrphV5ZrKzk5sEnoioh55Y>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:36:28 -0000

On Fri., 19 Apr. 2019, 04:29 Alexandre Petrescu, <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> In private conversation this debate happened:
>
> is an implementation that uses fe80:1::2 address on an interface a
> violation of standards? (RFC 4291 does not allow for '1' to be there).
>
> My point of view is that as long as that mplementation is widely used,
> that is not a violation of standards.



This is completely wrong.





  Rather, the situation makes it
> that that standard is not in agreement with implementations.
>
> Alex
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email