Re: about violation of standards

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 24 April 2019 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1730D12016A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IwDxGJsUeqPX for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 752C11200C7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:35:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3OEZRmC040728; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:35:27 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 7938E2040EA; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:35:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A35203F7B; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:35:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x3OEZRlC004815; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:35:27 +0200
Subject: Re: about violation of standards
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
References: <bb7f7606-2adf-e669-8bcd-e41f17800782@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd9frqX5-yeVPj8MYXpZ4737HqK1gmfD9cQV3A-Ea5HrQ@mail.gmail.com> <6bd5db47-408a-727e-5c13-f34a3465f986@si6networks.com> <CAJE_bqfTLqRbLp4fLu2ASZuZ+4G5c2G+RXkO92kXfLgPTqBnng@mail.gmail.com> <EEF00EA7-2AAF-403F-99AD-1D53ED18E8B3@cisco.com> <47631828-121F-402D-8165-969684C1101B@employees.org> <MN2PR11MB35655B36540829AEE5275964D8230@MN2PR11MB3565.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <1066F69A-824F-4D6D-B221-8EFBAD15E15A@employees.org> <018c407a-b127-8724-d1ee-e19e3b084a60@gmail.com> <CABNhwV1jWHc1SMm=-xX0Oo5V4bo4VQBeQ5-CztJhP3y9006HRw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904240659270.3490@uplift.swm.pp.se>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8bf8fa9c-7f86-d7bd-df46-43a99af3ea7d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:35:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904240659270.3490@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Y-6hh-nEAfOOtEqT8LHX6GkfF5o>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:35:33 -0000

If somebody starts a Problem Statement draft I am willing to help.

Alex

Le 24/04/2019 à 07:02, Mikael Abrahamsson a écrit :
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2019, Gyan Mishra wrote:
> 
>> So with this new link local revision we are trying to address the 
>> pitfalls with the current RFC 4291 RFC addressing schema for link 
>> local. Is that correct?
> 
> Can someone please start a new mail thread (or draft) where there is a 
> succinct problem statement and proposal for solution?
> 
> I spent non-trivial amount of time yesterday trying to make sense out of 
> all the emails that had been sent in the past week. I am not against 
> changing the standards if there is a problem that the current standards 
> doesn't address. I just want to understand it and the past 50-100 emails 
> has been causing me more confusion than clarity.
>